Automated classification of short echo time in in vivo 1H brain tumor spectra:: A multicenter study

被引:140
作者
Tate, AR [1 ]
Majós, C
Moreno, A
Howe, FA
Griffiths, JR
Arús, C
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Cognit & Comp Sci, Brighton BN1 9QH, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ London, St Georges Hosp Med Sch, CRC Biomed MR Res Grp, London, England
[3] Hosp Llobregat, CSU Bellvitge, Inst Diagnost Imatge, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Ctr Diagnost Pedralbes, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Bioquim & Biol Mol, Cerdanyola Del Valles, Spain
关键词
magnetic resonance spectroscopy; discriminant analysis; independent test set; pattern recognition;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.10315
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Automated pattern recognition techniques are needed to help radiologists categorize MRS data of brain tumors according to histological type and grade. A major question is whether a computer program "trained" on spectra from one hospital will be able to classify those from another, particularly if the acquisition protocol is different. A subset of 144 histopathologically validated brain tumor spectra in the INTERPRET database, obtained from three of the collaborating centers, was grouped into meningiomas, low-grade astrocytomas, and "aggressive tumors" (glioblastomas and metastases). Spectra from two centers formed the training set (94 spectra) while the third acted as the test set (50 spectra). Linear discriminant analysis successfully classified 48/50 in the test set; the remaining two were atypical cases. When the training and test sets were combined, 133 of the 144 spectra were correctly classified using the leave-one-out procedure. These spectra had been obtained using different sequences (STEAM and PRESS), different echo times (20, 30, 31, and 32 ms), different repetition times (1600 and 2000 ms), and different manufacturers' instruments (GE and Philips). Pattern recognition algorithms are less sensitive to acquisition parameters than had been expected.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Altman DG, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P453, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::AID-SIM350>3.3.CO
  • [2] 2-X
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1990, SUBSET SELECTION REG, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-2939-6
  • [4] Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in brain tumours:: clinical applications
    Burtscher, IM
    Holtås, S
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY, 2001, 43 (05) : 345 - 352
  • [5] Danielsen E.R., 1999, MAGNETIC RESONANCE S
  • [6] QUALITY - QUANTIFICATION IMPROVEMENT BY CONVERTING LINESHAPES TO THE LORENTZIAN TYPE
    DEGRAAF, AA
    VANDIJK, JE
    BOVEE, WMMJ
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1990, 13 (03) : 343 - 357
  • [7] Everitt B.S., 1991, APPL MULTIVARIATE DA
  • [8] Hagberg G, 1998, NMR BIOMED, V11, P148, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199806/08)11:4/5<148::AID-NBM511>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-4
  • [10] IN-VIVO PROTON MR SPECTROSCOPY OF HUMAN GLIOMAS - DEFINITION OF METABOLIC COORDINATES FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL CLASSIFICATION
    HAGBERG, G
    BURLINA, AP
    MADER, I
    ROSER, W
    RADUE, EW
    SEELIG, J
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (02) : 242 - 252