Goals and Social Comparisons Promote Walking Behavior

被引:20
作者
Chapman, Gretchen B. [1 ]
Colby, Helen [2 ]
Convery, Kimberly [1 ]
Coups, Elliot J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Inst Hlth Healthcare Policy & Aging Res, 112 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Med, Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
behavior change; walking; physical activity; pedometer; reference point; goals; social comparison; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PEDOMETERS;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X15592156
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The effectiveness of a pedometer intervention was affected by manipulating the goals given to participants and by providing social comparison feedback about how participants' performance compared with others. In study 1 (n = 148), university staff members received a low, medium, or high walking goal (10%, 50%, or 100% increase over baseline walking). Participants walked 1358 more steps per day (95% confidence interval [CI], 729, 1985), when receiving a high goal than when receiving a medium goal, but a medium goal did not increase walking relative to a low goal (554 more steps; 95% CI, -71,1179). In study 2 (n = 64), participants received individual feedback only or individual plus social comparison feedback. Participants walked 1120 more steps per day (95% CI, 538, 1703) when receiving social comparison feedback than when receiving only individual feedback. Goals and the performance of others act as reference points and influence the effect that pedometer feedback has on walking behavior, illustrating the applicability of the principles of behavioral economics and social psychology to the design of health behavior interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 478
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Social norms and energy conservation [J].
Allcott, Hunt .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2011, 95 (9-10) :1082-1095
[2]   Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health - A systematic review [J].
Bravata, Dena M. ;
Smith-Spangler, Crystal ;
Sundaram, Vandana ;
Gienger, Allison L. ;
Lin, Nancy ;
Lewis, Robyn ;
Stave, Christopher D. ;
Olkin, Ingram ;
Sirard, John R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (19) :2296-2304
[3]   Goals as reference points [J].
Heath, C ;
Larrick, RP ;
Wu, G .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 38 (01) :79-109
[4]   Converging to the Lowest Common Denominator in Physical Health [J].
John, Leslie K. ;
Norton, Michael I. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 32 (09) :1023-1028
[5]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[6]   The importance of walking to public health [J].
Lee, I-Min ;
Buchner, David M. .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2008, 40 (07) :S512-S518
[7]   Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation - A 35-year odyssey [J].
Locke, EA ;
Latham, GP .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2002, 57 (09) :705-717
[8]   Prevalence of Self-Reported Aerobic Physical Activity Among U.S. States and Territories-Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2007 [J].
Loustalot, Fleetwood ;
Carlson, Susan A. ;
Fulton, Janet E. ;
Kruger, Judy ;
Galuska, Deborah A. ;
Lobelo, Felipe .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2009, 6 :S9-S17
[9]  
Schmidt MD, 2007, RES Q EXERCISE SPORT, V78, P162
[10]   The constructive, destructive and reconstructive power of social norms [J].
Schultz, P. Wesley ;
Nolan, Jessica M. ;
Cialdini, Robert B. ;
Goldstein, Noah J. ;
Griskevicius, Vladas .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (05) :429-434