Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs

被引:184
作者
Drummond, Michael F. [1 ]
Wilson, David A.
Kanavos, Panos
Ubel, Peter
Rovira, Joan
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Hlth Profess, Boston, MA 02129 USA
[3] Genzyme Corp, Dept Hlth Econ, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[4] London Sch Econ, LSE Hlth & Social Care, London WC2A 2AE, England
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Barcelona, Dept Econ Theory, Fac Econ & Managerial Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[7] SOIKOS, SOIKOS Consultancy Firm, Barcelona 08013, Spain
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; equity; health policy;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462307051550
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Historically, patients with rare diseases have been underserved by commercial drug development. In several jurisdictions, specific legislation has been enacted to encourage the development of drugs for rare diseases (orphan drugs), which would otherwise not be commercially viable. However, because of the small market, these drugs are often very expensive. Under the standard methods of health technology assessment (HTA) incorporating economic evaluation, orphan drugs do not usually prove to be cost-effective and this, coupled with their high cost, means that funding and patient access may be limited. However, these restrictions may not be in line with societal preferences. Therefore, this study discusses whether the standard methods of HTA are adequate for assisting decisions on patient access to and funding of orphan drugs and outlines a research agenda to help understand the societal value of orphan drugs and issues surrounding their development, funding, and use.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 42
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*ALC, 2005, STUD ORPH DRUGS
[2]  
*COMM ASUTR, 2006, OTH SUPPL ARR OUTS P
[3]  
*COMP, EMEA352182005 COMP
[4]   TRANSFERRING THE COSTS OF EXPENSIVE TREATMENTS FROM SECONDARY TO PRIMARY-CARE [J].
CRUMP, BJ ;
PANTON, R ;
DRUMMOND, MF ;
MARCHMENT, M ;
HAWKES, RA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6978) :509-512
[5]  
*DEP HLTH, 2002, 2002004 HSC
[6]  
*DEP HLTH, 2002, PAYM RES BREAKTH END
[7]   Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis [J].
Devlin, N ;
Parkin, D .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (05) :437-452
[8]   ECONOMIC-ASPECTS OF RISK ASSESSMENT IN CHEMICAL SAFETY [J].
DRUMMOND, MF ;
SHANNON, HS .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1986, 51 :81-124
[9]  
*EUR EUR, 2005, SURV RES
[10]   Cost effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making - Evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996) [J].
George, B ;
Harris, A ;
Mitchell, A .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (11) :1103-1109