The prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study

被引:8
作者
Dai, Qianwen [1 ]
Xu, Baolin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Huanwen [3 ]
You, Yan [3 ]
Wu, Ming [1 ]
Li, Lei [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shuaifuyuan 1, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Second Peoples Hosp Jingdezhen, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jingdezhen 333099, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Pathol, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
关键词
Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma; Fertility-sparing treatment; Ovarian preservation; Surgery; Recurrence; Survival outcomes;
D O I
10.1186/s13023-021-01802-8
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe prognosis of recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is little known. This study was to investigate the survival outcomes of a cohort of patients with recurrent LGESS.MethodsPatients with primary LGESS diagnosed and treated for first recurrence confirmed by histology in the study center from February 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The progression-free interval (PFI) after the last treatment for first recurrence and overall survival (OS) since the diagnosis of first recurrence, which were followed up to June 1, 2020, were compared between groups of various therapy modalities.ResultsFifty-six patients were included, and 43 patients (76.8%) had definite follow-up outcomes. The 5-year PFI and OS rates were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 29.2-30.8) and 75.0% (68.0-82.0), respectively. In univariate analysis, only fertility-sparing treatment, ovarian preservation and surgical treatment had a significant impact on the PFI (hazard ratio [HR] 4.5, 3.1, and 0.2; 95% CI 1.5-13.1, 1.3-7.3, and 0.1-0.7; and p=0.006, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively), but no factor was found to be associated with increased mortality risk. After adjusted with hormone treatment or chemotherapy, surgical treatment had significant effectiveness on OS (HR 0.3 and 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-1.0 and 0.1-1.0, p=0.045 and 0.049, respectively). None of the patients with fertility-sparing treatment had successful conception, and all experienced repeated relapse.ConclusionFor patients with recurrent LGESS, fertility-sparing treatment or ovarian preservation should not be provided. Surgery is the treatment of choice, and hormone treatment and/or chemotherapy was effective for the survival benefits of surgical treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients [J].
Abeler, Vera M. ;
Royne, Odd ;
Thoresen, Steinar ;
Danielsen, Havard E. ;
Nesland, Jahn M. ;
Kristensen, Gunnar B. .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 54 (03) :355-364
[2]   Endometrial stromal sarcoma-A retropsective analysis of factors affecting recurrence [J].
Agarwal, Reshu ;
Rajanbabu, Anupama ;
Nair, Indu R. ;
Satish, Chandramouli ;
Jose, Georgeena ;
Unikrishnan, U. G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 216 :92-97
[3]   Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases [J].
Bai, Huimin ;
Yang, Jiaxin ;
Cao, Dongyan ;
Huang, Huifang ;
Xiang, Yang ;
Wu, Ming ;
Cui, Quancai ;
Chen, Jie ;
Lang, Jinghe ;
Shen, Keng .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 132 (03) :654-660
[4]   Does Radiotherapy or Lymphadenectomy improve Survival in Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma? [J].
Barney, Brandon ;
Tward, Jonathan D. ;
Skidmore, Thomas ;
Gaffney, David K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (07) :1232-1238
[5]   Prognostic parameters in endometrial stromal sarcoma: A clinicopathologic study in 31 patients [J].
Bodner, K ;
Bodner-Adler, B ;
Obermair, A ;
Windbichler, G ;
Petru, E ;
Mayerhofer, S ;
Czerwenka, K ;
Leodolter, S ;
Kainz, C ;
Mayerhofer, K .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 81 (02) :160-165
[6]   Outcome and prognosis in uterine sarcoma and malignant mixed Mullerian tumor [J].
Burghaus, Stefanie ;
Halmen, Sonja ;
Gass, Paul ;
Mehlhorn, Grit ;
Schrauder, Michael G. ;
Lux, Michael P. ;
Renner, Stefan P. ;
Beckmann, Matthias W. ;
Hein, Alexander ;
Thiel, Falk C. .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 294 (02) :343-351
[7]   Endometrial stromal sarcoma: A review of rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasm [J].
Capozzi, V. A. ;
Monfardini, L. ;
Ceni, V. ;
Cianciolo, A. ;
Butera, D. ;
Gaiano, M. ;
Berretta, R. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (11) :2221-2236
[8]   Fertility-sparing management combined with photodynamic therapy for endometrial stromal sarcoma: A case report [J].
Choi, Min Chul ;
Kim, Gwangil ;
Hwang, Yoon Young .
PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2014, 11 (04) :533-536
[9]   The clinical benefits of hormonal treatment for LG-ESS: a meta-analysis [J].
Cui, Ran ;
Cao, Guangming ;
Bai, Huimin ;
Zhang, Zhenyu .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 300 (05) :1167-1175
[10]   The efficacy of hormonal treatment for residual or recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. A retrospective study [J].
Dahhan, Taghride ;
Fons, Guus ;
Buist, Marrije R. ;
ten Kate, Fibo J. W. ;
van der Velden, Jacobus .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 144 (01) :80-84