Improving the precision of high-rate GPS

被引:144
|
作者
Larson, Kristine M. [1 ]
Bilich, Andria [1 ]
Axelrad, Penina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Aerosp Engn Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM; 1-HZ GPS; GROUND MOTIONS; EARTHQUAKE; CALIFORNIA; DISPLACEMENTS; RESOLUTION; PARKFIELD;
D O I
10.1029/2006JB004367
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In order to improve the accuracy of high-rate (1 Hz) displacements for geophysical applications such as seismology it is important to reduce systematic errors at seismic frequencies. One such GPS error source that overlaps with seismic frequencies and is not currently modeled is multipath. This study investigates the frequencies and repetition of multipath in high-rate GPS time series in order to maximize the effectiveness of techniques relying upon the geometric repeatability of GPS satellite orbits. The implementation of the aspect repeat time adjustment (ARTA) method described here uses GPS position time series to estimate time-varying and site-dependent shifts. As demonstrated for high-rate GPS sites in southern California this technique significantly reduces positioning noise at periods from 20 to 1000 s. For a 12-hour time series, ARTA methods improve the standard deviation of the north component from 8.2 to 5.1 mm and the east component from 6.3 to 4.0 mm. After applying ARTA corrections, common mode errors are removed by stacking. This method further improves the standard deviations to 3.0 and 2.6 mm for the north and east components, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stochastic Models of Very High-Rate (50 Hz) GPS/BeiDou Code and Phase Observations
    Shu, Yuanming
    Fang, Rongxin
    Liu, Jingnan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (11):
  • [22] High-rate precise point positioning (PPP) to measure seismic wave motions: an experimental comparison of GPS PPP with inertial measurement units
    Xu, Peiliang
    Shi, Chuang
    Fang, Rongxin
    Liu, Jingnan
    Niu, Xiaoji
    Zhang, Quan
    Yanagidani, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2013, 87 (04) : 361 - 372
  • [23] Very high-rate GPS for measuring dynamic seismic displacements without aliasing: performance evaluation of the variometric approach
    Shu, Yuanming
    Fang, Rongxin
    Li, Min
    Shi, Chuang
    Li, Meng
    Liu, Jingnan
    GPS SOLUTIONS, 2018, 22 (04)
  • [24] Ground motion monitoring during strong shake with high-rate GPS double-differenced residual model
    Feng Wei
    Huang Ding-Fa
    Li Meng
    Zhang Xi
    Yan Li
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2013, 56 (09): : 3022 - 3028
  • [25] Coseismic and Postseismic Deformation Associated with the 2018 Mw 7.9 Kodiak, Alaska, Earthquake from Low-Rate and High-Rate GPS Observations
    Wen, Yangmao
    Guo, Zelong
    Xu, Caijun
    Xu, Guangyu
    Song, Chuang
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2019, 109 (03) : 908 - 918
  • [26] Towards Galileo plus GPS seismology: Validation of high-rate GNSS-based system for seismic events characterisation
    Paziewski, Jacek
    Kurpinski, Grzegorz
    Wielgosz, Pawel
    Stolecki, Lech
    Sieradzki, Rafal
    Seta, Mateusz
    Oszczak, Stanislaw
    Castillo, Manuel
    Martin-Porqueras, Fernando
    MEASUREMENT, 2020, 166
  • [27] Love wave dispersion in central North America determined using absolute displacement seismograms from high-rate GPS
    Davis, James P.
    Smalley, Robert, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2009, 114
  • [28] Focal Mechanisms of the 2016 Central Italy Earthquake Sequence Inferred from High-Rate GPS and Broadband Seismic Waveforms
    Zhong, Shuhan
    Xu, Caijun
    Yi, Lei
    Li, Yanyan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [29] Co-seismic displacement and waveforms of the 2018 Alaska earthquake from high-rate GPS PPP velocity estimation
    Jin, Shuanggen
    Su, Ke
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2019, 93 (09) : 1559 - 1569
  • [30] Co-seismic displacement and waveforms of the 2018 Alaska earthquake from high-rate GPS PPP velocity estimation
    Shuanggen Jin
    Ke Su
    Journal of Geodesy, 2019, 93 : 1559 - 1569