Telecoupled environmental impacts are an obstacle to meeting the sustainable development goals

被引:9
作者
Zeng, Yiwen [1 ]
Runting, Rebecca K. [2 ]
Watson, James E. M. [3 ]
Carrasco, Luis Roman [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Biol Sci, 14 Sci Dr 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Geog, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
emissions; environmental impacts; forest loss; global trade; policy; water use;
D O I
10.1002/sd.2229
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
International trade is responsible for connecting human and natural systems across distant countries, and has profound implications for sustainability. In particular, telecoupling, the socioeconomic and environmental interactions between distant countries as a result of, among others, global trade, typically leaves less affluent nations bearing the largest environmental impacts. Telecoupling effects are likely to be pervasive to those trying to achieve the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but little is known about how telecoupling affects the SDGs beyond a subset of environment-related targets. Here, we take a broad global network analysis approach to address this gap, and assess the vulnerability of the SDGs' indicators and their interactions to telecoupling across 180 countries. We find that a majority (similar to 78%) of the SDG indicators are significantly correlated (p-value <.05) to indicators of telecoupled environmental impacts, indicating that higher performing countries under SDGs indicators do so helped by externalizing their environmental impacts. We also find that, by proactively accounting for telecoupling, connectivity between goals is reduced in 11 of the 17 SDGs, reducing the trade-offs between environmental-related and development SDGs in developing countries. Our results reinforce the need for better integration of telecoupling when monitoring progress towards the SDGs for development to be truly sustainable and equitable.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 82
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change
    Althor, Glenn
    Watson, James E. M.
    Fuller, Richard A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [2] Sustainability and development after COVID-19
    Barbier, Edward B.
    Burgess, Joanne C.
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 135
  • [3] Bolshanik P.V., 2019, ENV DYN GLOB CLIM CH, V10, P16, DOI [10.17816/edgcc10454, DOI 10.17816/EDGCC10454]
  • [4] Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020, ZER DRAFT POST 2020 ZER DRAFT POST 2020
  • [5] The Anthropocene reality of financial risk
    Crona, Beatrice
    Folke, Carl
    Galaz, Victor
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2021, 4 (05): : 618 - 628
  • [6] Is the Power of Brand-Focused Activism Rising? The Case of Tropical Deforestation
    Dauvergne, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 26 (02) : 135 - 155
  • [7] Marine policy special issue: SDG synergies for sustainable fisheries and poverty alleviation
    Diz, Daniela
    Morgera, Elisa
    Wilson, Meriwether
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2019, 110
  • [8] Forest Trends' Ecosystem Marketplace, 2019, FIN EM RED FUT STAT
  • [9] Europe's Green Deal offshores environmental damage to other nations
    Fuchs, Richard
    Brown, Calum
    Rounsevell, Mark
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 586 (7831) : 671 - 673
  • [10] Why Ecologists Should Care about Financial Markets
    Galaz, Victor
    Gars, Johan
    Moberg, Fredrik
    Nykvist, Bjorn
    Repinski, Cecilia
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2015, 30 (10) : 571 - 580