Phase III double-blind study of glutamine versus placebo for the prevention of acute diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy

被引:70
作者
Kozelsky, TF
Meyers, GE
Sloan, JA
Shanahan, TG
Dick, SJ
Moore, RL
Engeler, GP
Frank, AR
McKone, TK
Urias, RE
Pilepich, MV
Novotny, PJ
Martenson, JA
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Duluth CCOP, Duluth, MN USA
[3] Carle Canc Ctr Community Clin Oncol Program, Urbana, IL USA
[4] Siouxland Hematol Oncol Associates, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[5] Iowa Oncol Res Assoc CCOP, Des Moines, IA USA
[6] Meritcare Hosp CCOP, Fargo, ND USA
[7] Toledo Community Hosp, Oncol Program, Toledo, OH USA
[8] Missouri Valley Canc Consortium, Omaha, NE USA
[9] Ann Arbor Reg CCOP, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2003.05.060
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: A phase III, randomized, double-blind study was conducted by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group to determine the efficacy and toxicity of oral glutamine for the prevention of acute diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy (RT). Patients and Methods: All 129 patients enrolled from 14 institutions between February 1998 and October 1999 were eligible. Patients received 4 9 of glutamine or placebo orally, twice a day, beginning with the first or second day of RT and continuing for 2 weeks after RT. During treatment, patients were assessed weekly for toxicity, and a bowel function questionnaire was administered. The primary measures of treatment efficacy were diarrhea levels measured by maximum grade of diarrhea, incidence of diarrhea, and average diarrhea score. After completion of RT, the bowel function questionnaire was administered weekly for 4 weeks and at 12 and 24 months. Toxicity was measured by National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. Results: The median age of patients was 69 years (range, 34 to 86 years). The two treatment arms were balanced with respect to all baseline factors. There were no significant differences in toxicity by treatment. Quality-of-life scores and the mean number of problems reported on the bowel function questionnaire were virtually identical for both treatment groups. The incidence of grade 3 or higher diarrhea was 20% for the glutamine arm and 19% for the placebo arm (P = .99). The maximum number of stools per day was 5.1 for the glutamine arm and 5.2 for the placebo arm (P = .99). Conclusion: There is no evidence of a beneficial effect of glutamine during pelvic RT.
引用
收藏
页码:1669 / 1674
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
AARONSON NK, 1991, CANCER, V67, P839, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910201)67:3+<839::AID-CNCR2820671415>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-0
[3]  
Anderson PM, 1998, CANCER, V83, P1433, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981001)83:7<1433::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-4
[5]   Glutamine supplementation in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A double-blind randomized study [J].
Bozzetti, F ;
Biganzoli, L ;
Gavazzi, C ;
Cappuzzo, F ;
Carnaghi, C ;
Buzzoni, R ;
Dibartolomeo, M ;
Baietta, E .
NUTRITION, 1997, 13 (7-8) :748-751
[6]  
Cella D F, 1995, Oncology (Williston Park), V9, P47
[7]   Effect of pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer on bowel, bladder, and sexual function: The patient's perspective [J].
Crook, J ;
Esche, B ;
Futter, N .
UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (03) :387-394
[8]   Oral glutamine in the prevention of fluorouracil induced intestinal toxicity: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial [J].
Daniele, B ;
Perrone, F ;
Gallo, C ;
Pignata, S ;
De Martino, S ;
De Vivo, R ;
Barletta, E ;
Tambaro, R ;
Abbiati, R ;
D'Agostino, L .
GUT, 2001, 48 (01) :28-33
[9]   A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF TREATMENT TECHNIQUES TO MINIMIZE THE VOLUME OF PELVIC SMALL-BOWEL WITH REDUCTION OF ACUTE AND LATE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH PELVIC IRRADIATION [J].
GALLAGHER, MJ ;
BRERETON, HD ;
ROSTOCK, RA ;
ZERO, JM ;
ZEKOSKI, DA ;
POYSS, LF ;
RICHTER, MP ;
KLIGERMAN, MM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1986, 12 (09) :1565-1573
[10]   Glutamine [J].
Hall, JC ;
Heel, K ;
McCauley, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (03) :305-312