Increasing effectiveness of the science-policy interface in the socioecological arena in Brazil

被引:16
作者
Scarano, Fabio R. [1 ]
Padgurschi, Maira C. G. [2 ]
Pires, Aliny P. F. [3 ]
Castro, Paula F. D. [2 ]
Farinaci, Juliana S. [4 ]
Bustamante, Mercedes [5 ]
Metzger, Jean P. [6 ]
Ometto, Jean P. [4 ]
Seixas, Cristiana S. [7 ]
Joly, Carlos A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Dept Ecol, BR-21941 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Biol Vegetal, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Dept Ecol, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[4] Inst Nacl Pesquisas Espaciais, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Brasilia, Dept Ecol, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Ecol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[7] Univ Estadual Campinas, Nucleo Estudos & Pesquisas Ambientais, Campinas, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Assessment reports; Boundary chain; Boundary object; BPBES; IPBES; BOUNDARY CHAINS; TRADE-OFFS; CLIMATE; INFORMATION; CREDIBILITY; LEGITIMACY; CHALLENGES; RELEVANCE; KNOWLEDGE; IPBES;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108227
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A group of scientists created in 2015 the Brazilian Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (BPBES), the first national-level initiative to emerge independently but inspired by the enterprise undertaken by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). The main goal of BPBES is to develop assessment and special reports in co-production and dialogue with governmental and non-governmental stakeholders in Brazil, but independently from governmental perusal. This paper describes BPBES's principles, design, routine practices, outputs, achievements, challenges, near-future perspectives, and costs. After three and a half years of activities, BPBES emerges as a link that connects various organisations within a boundary chain at the science-policy interface. By navigating the socioecological arena, engaging with various actors, we argue that BPBES is an emerging important player in conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Brazil. Differently from the regular scientific panel that produces assessment reports and special reports from time to time, we discuss the BPBES approach whereby such reports are due to be continuously updated by a system that combines consultation to and engagement of multiple actors, curators of specific themes, revision work, and communication to non-expert audiences. Challenges include how to avoid fatigue typical of extensive participatory processes, how to deal with the issue of representativeness of stakeholders selected, and long-term fundraising strategy. Finally, we discuss the potential relevance of other national level initiatives to facilitate on-the-ground implementation of practices and aspirations fostered by intergovernmental panels.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts [J].
Abessa, Denis ;
Fama, Ana ;
Buruaem, Lucas .
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2019, 3 (04) :510-511
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, IPBES REGIONAL ASSES, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3237429
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GLOBAL WARMING 15C I, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157940.001
[4]  
Archer E., 2018, Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
[5]   Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil [J].
Azevedo-Santos, Valter M. ;
Fearnside, Philip M. ;
Oliveira, Caroline S. ;
Padial, Andre A. ;
Pelicice, Fernando M. ;
Lima, Dilermando P., Jr. ;
Simberloff, Daniel ;
Lovejoy, Thomas E. ;
Magalhaes, Andre L. B. ;
Orsi, Mario L. ;
Agostinho, Angelo A. ;
Esteves, Francisco A. ;
Pompeu, Paulo S. ;
Laurance, William F. ;
Petrere, Miguel, Jr. ;
Mormul, Roger P. ;
Vitule, Jean R. S. .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2017, 26 (07) :1745-1752
[6]  
Barkemeyer R, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P311, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2824, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2824]
[7]   The IPCC and the new map of science and politics [J].
Beck, Silke ;
Mahony, Martin .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 9 (06)
[8]   A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation [J].
Bertuol-Garcia, Diana ;
Morsello, Carla ;
El-Hani, Charbel N. ;
Pardini, Renata .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2018, 93 (02) :1032-1055
[9]   Science-Policy Interface: Scientific Input Limited [J].
Briggs, Sue V. ;
Knight, Andrew T. .
SCIENCE, 2011, 333 (6043) :696-697
[10]   IPBES ≠ IPCC [J].
Brooks, Thomas M. ;
Lamoreux, John F. ;
Soberon, Jorge .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (10) :543-545