Assessment of the bioequivalence of different formulations containing azithromycin (tablets and suspension)

被引:0
|
作者
Koytchev, R
Ozalp, Y
Erenmemisoglu, A
van der Meer, MJ
Alpan, RS
机构
[1] Cooperat Clin Drug Res & Dev AG, D-15366 Neuenhagen, Germany
[2] EIS Eczacibasi Ilac Sanayi Ticaret AS, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Erciyes Univ, Sch Med, Kayseri, Turkey
[4] Trident Bioanlyt Ltd, Cork, Ireland
来源
ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH | 2004年 / 54卷 / 9A期
关键词
azithromycin; bioequivalence; clinical pharmacokinetics; Azro((R)); CAS; 11772-70-0;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Azithromycin (CAS 11772-70-0) is an orally administered macrolide antimicrobial drug, structurally related to erythromycin, with a similar spectrum of antimicrobial activity. The aim of the present studies, performed in two different groups of volunteers, was to compare the bioavallability of azithromycin (Azro(R)) 500 mg tablets (study 1) and azithromycin (Azro(R)) 200 mg/5 mL suspensions (study 2) with originator products. Each study was conducted according to an open, randomized, single-dose, two-period cross-over design in 24 healthy volunteers with a wash-out period from 14 to 21 days. Blood samples were taken up to 96 h post dosing, and concentrations of azithromycin were determined by HPLC method. In the first study, the 90 % confidence interval for intra-individual ratios (test vs. reference) of AUC(0-t), and C-max of azithromycin were between 0.82 and 1.04 for AUC(0-t) and 0.81 and 1.11 for C-max, and thus within the acceptance ranges for bioequivalence trials. The 90 % confidence interval for intra-individual ratios of AUC(0-t) and C-max of azithromycin administered as suspension were between 0.89 and 1.22 and 0.91 and 1.23, respectively. These values were also within the acceptance range. Concerning the secondary parameter t(max) the 90 % confidence interval for the intra-individual differences for azithromycin were between -0.49 - 0.50 in the first and between -0.50 - 0.25 in the second study, respectively. In the light of the results of the studies reported here it can be concluded that azithromycin test formulations, i.e. tablet and suspension are bioequivalent to the respective reference formulations.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 582
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two imatinib formulations as film-coated tablets, 400 mg
    Smirnov, V. V.
    Tashirova, O. A.
    Khaitov, M. R.
    PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY JOURNAL, 2013, 46 (10) : 622 - 625
  • [42] Bioequivalence Study of Two Formulations of Mifepristone Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting Conditions
    Li, Mupeng
    Yi, Xinchu
    Fan, Lianlian
    Yang, Luoxi
    Xie, Shan
    Shentu, Jianzhong
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 12 (09): : 874 - 880
  • [43] Bioequivalence study of two formulations of bisoprolol fumarate film-coated tablets in healthy subjects
    Tjandrawinata, Raymond R.
    Setiawati, Effi
    Yunaidi, Danang Agung
    Santoso, Iwan Dwi
    Setiawati, Arini
    Susanto, Liana W.
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2012, 6 : 311 - 316
  • [44] Comparative pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two imatinib formulations as film-coated tablets, 400 mg
    V. V. Smirnov
    O. A. Tashirova
    M. R. Khaitov
    Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal, 2013, 46 : 622 - 625
  • [45] Quality Attributes and In Vitro Bioequivalence of Different Brands of Amoxicillin Trihydrate Tablets
    Al-Tabakha, Moawia M.
    Fahelelbom, Khairi M. S.
    Obaid, Dana Emad Eddin
    Sayed, Sadik
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2017, 9 (02)
  • [46] Bioequivalence studies with metformin: comparability of reference tablets from different origins
    Vlahov, V
    Thyroff-Friesinger, U
    Koytchev, R
    Bakracheva, N
    Gatchev, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 43 (09) : 457 - 462
  • [47] Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of 2 Azithromycin Tablet Formulations: A Randomized, Open-Label, 2-Stage Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers
    Leong, Chuei Wuei
    Yee, Kar Ming
    Nalaiya, Jeyashanthini
    Kassim, Zawahil
    Rahim, Sharifah Radziah Syed Abd
    Ahmad, Shahnun
    Amran, Atiqah
    Krishnamurthy, Lakshman
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 11 (09): : 1078 - 1083
  • [48] Pharmacokinetic profiling and bioequivalence assessment of two marketed brands of nevirapine tablets in healthy Indian volunteers
    Narang, VS
    Lulla, A
    Malhotra, G
    Purandare, S
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2005, 55 (10): : 598 - 603
  • [49] Bioequivalence evaluation of three different oral formulations of ciprofloxacin in healthy volunteers
    Maya, MT
    Gonçalves, NJ
    Silva, NE
    Filipe, AE
    Morais, JA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS, 2003, 28 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [50] Bioequivalence evaluation of 2 different oral formulations of ciprofloxacin in healthy volunteers
    Galicia, I
    Frias-Iniesta, J
    Carcas, AJ
    Soto, A
    Gomez, E
    Miranda, E
    Fernandez, A
    Montuenga, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 36 (05) : 282 - 285