Assessment of the bioequivalence of different formulations containing azithromycin (tablets and suspension)

被引:0
|
作者
Koytchev, R
Ozalp, Y
Erenmemisoglu, A
van der Meer, MJ
Alpan, RS
机构
[1] Cooperat Clin Drug Res & Dev AG, D-15366 Neuenhagen, Germany
[2] EIS Eczacibasi Ilac Sanayi Ticaret AS, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Erciyes Univ, Sch Med, Kayseri, Turkey
[4] Trident Bioanlyt Ltd, Cork, Ireland
来源
ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH | 2004年 / 54卷 / 9A期
关键词
azithromycin; bioequivalence; clinical pharmacokinetics; Azro((R)); CAS; 11772-70-0;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Azithromycin (CAS 11772-70-0) is an orally administered macrolide antimicrobial drug, structurally related to erythromycin, with a similar spectrum of antimicrobial activity. The aim of the present studies, performed in two different groups of volunteers, was to compare the bioavallability of azithromycin (Azro(R)) 500 mg tablets (study 1) and azithromycin (Azro(R)) 200 mg/5 mL suspensions (study 2) with originator products. Each study was conducted according to an open, randomized, single-dose, two-period cross-over design in 24 healthy volunteers with a wash-out period from 14 to 21 days. Blood samples were taken up to 96 h post dosing, and concentrations of azithromycin were determined by HPLC method. In the first study, the 90 % confidence interval for intra-individual ratios (test vs. reference) of AUC(0-t), and C-max of azithromycin were between 0.82 and 1.04 for AUC(0-t) and 0.81 and 1.11 for C-max, and thus within the acceptance ranges for bioequivalence trials. The 90 % confidence interval for intra-individual ratios of AUC(0-t) and C-max of azithromycin administered as suspension were between 0.89 and 1.22 and 0.91 and 1.23, respectively. These values were also within the acceptance range. Concerning the secondary parameter t(max) the 90 % confidence interval for the intra-individual differences for azithromycin were between -0.49 - 0.50 in the first and between -0.50 - 0.25 in the second study, respectively. In the light of the results of the studies reported here it can be concluded that azithromycin test formulations, i.e. tablet and suspension are bioequivalent to the respective reference formulations.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 582
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bioequivalence assessment of two different tablet formulations of diltiazem after single and repeated doses in healthy subjects
    Loffreda, A
    Matera, MG
    Vacca, C
    Motola, G
    De Santis, D
    Ruggiero, A
    Russo, F
    Fici, F
    Cantoni, V
    Lampa, E
    Rossi, F
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1999, 15 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [32] AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF BIOEQUIVALENCE BETWEEN 2 FORMULATIONS OF A DRUG
    CHOW, SC
    SHAO, J
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 32 (08) : 969 - 976
  • [33] Bioequivalence of Different Formulations of Zonisamide Oral Suspensions: A Short Review
    Stevic, Ivana
    Petrovic, Nemanja
    Jankovic, Slobodan M.
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 2841 - 2845
  • [34] Topical corticosteroid formulations: bioequivalence assessment and guidelines for appropriate use
    Demana, P. H.
    SA PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 81 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [35] Bioequivalence study of two oral tablet formulations containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy volunteers
    Yerino, Gustavo A.
    Halabe, Emilia K.
    Zini, Elvira
    Feleder, Ethel C.
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2011, 61 (01): : 55 - 60
  • [36] Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Study of Two Different Omeprazole Capsule Formulations in Healthy Bangladeshi Volunteers
    Joti, Jafreen Jamal
    Nahar, Kamrun
    Hasan, Ahasanul
    Azad, Mohammad Abul Kalam
    Ullah, Md. Ashik
    Islam, S. M. Ashraful
    Hasnat, Abul
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2009, 59 (04): : 171 - 175
  • [37] Comparative pharmacokinetics of two tablet formulations of losartan: Bioequivalence assessment
    Tamimi, JJI
    Salem, II
    Alam, SM
    Zaman, Q
    Dham, R
    BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 2005, 26 (05) : 205 - 210
  • [38] Bioequivalence study of two capsule formulations containing diacerein 50 mg in healthy human subjects
    Chakrabarty, Uday S.
    Mandal, Uttam
    Bhaumik, Uttam
    Chatterjee, Bappaditya
    Ghosh, Animesh
    Bose, Anirban
    Pal, Tapan K.
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2008, 58 (08): : 405 - 409
  • [39] Bioequivalence Study of Generic Tablet Formulations Containing Ethinylestradiol and Chlormadinone Acetate in Healthy Female Volunteers
    Bonn, Michael
    Eydeler, Urte
    Barkworth, Martin
    Rovati, Lucio C.
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2009, 59 (12): : 651 - 658
  • [40] Bioequivalence study of two tablet formulations containing rimonabant 20 mg in healthy Indian subjects
    Nandi, Utpal
    Bhaumik, Uttam
    Chakrabarty, Uday S.
    Das, Ayan
    Pal, Tapan K.
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2011, 61 (02): : 80 - 84