Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration

被引:675
作者
Mittenberg, W [1 ]
Patton, C [1 ]
Canyock, EM [1 ]
Condit, DC [1 ]
机构
[1] Nova SE Univ, Ctr Psychol Studies, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Base rates of probable malingering and symptom exaggeration are reported from a survey of the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology membership. Estimates were based on 33,531 annual cases involved in personal injury. (n=6,371), disability (n=3,688). criminal (n=1,341) or medical (n=22,131) matters, Base rates did not differ among geographic regions or practice settings, but were related to the proportion of plaintiff versus defence referrals. Reported rates would be 2-4% higher if variance due to referral source was controlled. Twenty-nine percent of personal injury, 30% of disability, 19% of criminal, and 8% of medical cases involved probable malingering and symptom exaggeration. Thirty-nine percent of mild head injury, 35% of fibromyalgia/chronic fatigue, 31% of chronic pain, 27% of neurotoxic, and 22% of electrical injury claims resulted in diagnostic impressions of probable malingering. Diagnosis was supported by multiple sources of evidence. including severity (65% of cases) or pattern (64% of cases) of cognitive impairment that was inconsistent with the condition, scores below empirical cutoff's on forced choice tests (57% of cases). discrepancies among records. self-report, and observed behavior (56%) implausible self-reported symptoms in interview (46%), implausible changes in test scores across repeated examination (45%), and validity scales on objective personality tests (38% of cases).
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1102
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J FORENSIC NEUROPSYC, DOI DOI 10.1300/J151v02n02_01
[2]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT
[3]   Symptom validity testing: A critical review [J].
Bianchini, KJ ;
Mathias, CW ;
Greve, KW .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 15 (01) :19-45
[4]   A review of mild head trauma .1. Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies [J].
Binder, LM ;
Rohling, ML ;
Larrabee, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 (03) :421-431
[5]  
BINDER LM, 1996, ASSESSMENT, V3, P403, DOI DOI 10.1177/107319119600300405
[6]  
CULLUM CM, 1991, FORENSIC NEUROPSYCHO, P141
[7]   Discrepancy between predicted and obtained WAIS-R IQ scores discriminates between traumatic brain injury and insufficient effort [J].
Demakis, GJ ;
Sweet, JJ ;
Sawyer, TP ;
Moulthrop, M ;
Nies, K ;
Clingerman, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2001, 13 (02) :240-248
[8]   Practices in forensic neuropsychology: Perspectives of neuropsychologists and trial attorneys [J].
Essig, SM ;
Mittenberg, W ;
Petersen, RS ;
Strauman, S ;
Cooper, JT .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 16 (03) :271-291
[9]   Mixed group validation: A method to address the limitations of criterion group validation in research on malingering detection [J].
Frederick, RI .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2000, 18 (06) :693-718
[10]  
Gervais RO, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P1892