Effect of different definitions of prescription point "A" in high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer

被引:1
作者
Srivastava, Shraddha [1 ]
Painuly, Nirmal Kumar [1 ]
Mishra, Surendra Prasad [2 ]
Srivastava, Kirti [1 ]
Singh, Navin [1 ]
Bhatt, Madan Lal Brahma [1 ]
机构
[1] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Radiotherapy, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Inst Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Brachytherapy; cervical cancer; high dose rate; point A; MRI; RECOMMENDATIONS; TERMS;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_480_18
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: This study intended to compare the dosimetric parameters using different definitions of prescription point A in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy of cervical cancer patients.Background: Manchester point A has been widely used for prescribing dose in brachytherapy. However, due to certain limitations of this point, a new definition of point A has been recommended by the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS).Materials and Methods: We retrospectively investigated 55 computed tomography-based plans of 20 cervical cancer patients treated with Ir-192-based intracavitary HDR brachytherapy. The dose of 7 Gy in 3 fractions each was prescribed to point A using revised Manchester definition of point A (AMAN) and ABS guideline definition (AABS). The effect of both definitions on various parameters including dose to point A and 90% of tumor volume (D90), dose received by 2cc volume of bladder, rectum and small bowel and treatment volume receiving 100% of prescription dose (V100) was analyzed.Results: Mean percentage difference of point AMAN dose and AABS dose with respect to prescription dose was 1.25% +/- 1.43% and 1.21% +/- 1.01%, respectively. Mean V100 was 80.4 +/- 20.45cc and 88.47 +/- 16.78cc for AMAN and AABS plans, respectively, while mean percentage difference between prescribed dose and D90 was found to be -37.90% +/- 25.06% and -30.47% +/- 25.50% respectively for both the definitions.Conclusion: Doses to both Manchester point A and ABS point A may be recorded during the transition period. However, ABS point A can be preferred over the Manchester point A as it conforms better with the desired dosimetric outcome and is found to be more static.
引用
收藏
页码:1365 / 1369
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Dosimetric impact of point A definition on high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer: evaluations on conventional point A and MRI-guided, conformal plans [J].
Anderson, James ;
Huang, Yunfei ;
Kim, Yusung .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2012, 4 (04) :241-246
[2]   Variations in Point Dose Specification in 3-Dimensional Planning for Intracavitary Cervical Brachytherapy [J].
Chennupati, S. K. ;
Merz, B. ;
Kalpathy-Cramer, J. ;
Wissel, A. K. ;
Wang, S. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02) :S469-S470
[3]   Comparison of high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy dose-prescription to point A versus to point H in the treatment of cervical carcinoma [J].
Demandante, C. G. N. ;
Eng, T. Y. ;
Yam, M. T. ;
Baacke, D. R. ;
Kim, G. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01) :S364-S365
[4]   Point A or point H in prescribing high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma? [J].
Eng, T. Y. ;
Cummins, S. ;
Baake, D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03) :S396-S397
[5]   Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group* (I):: concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV [J].
Haie-Meder, C ;
Pötter, R ;
Van Limbergen, E ;
Briot, E ;
De Brabandere, M ;
Dimopoulos, J ;
Dumas, I ;
Hellebust, TP ;
Kirisits, C ;
Lang, SF ;
Muschitz, S ;
Nevinson, J ;
Nulens, A ;
Petrow, P ;
Wachter-Gerstner, N .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 74 (03) :235-245
[6]  
Howell R. M., 2001, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, V51, P330, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02432-4
[7]   Dosimetric consequences of the prescription point H of ABS recommendation in the era of MRI guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Based on GYN GEC-ESTRO recommendations of MRI guided brachytherapy [J].
Kim, Y. ;
Huang, Y. ;
Bayouth, J. E. ;
Flynn, R. T. ;
Bhatia, S. K. ;
Jacobson, G. M. ;
Modrick, J. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01) :S586-S587
[8]   CT or MRI for Image-based Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer [J].
Krishnatry, Rahul ;
Patel, Firuza D. ;
Singh, Paramjeet ;
Sharma, Suresh C. ;
Oinam, Arun S. ;
Shukla, Arvind K. .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 42 (04) :309-313
[9]  
Potish R., 1995, Dose Prescription, Dose Specification, and Applicator Geometry in Intracavitary Therapy
[10]   Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II):: Concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy -: 3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiotogy [J].
Pötter, R ;
Haie-Meder, C ;
Van Limbergen, E ;
Barillot, I ;
De Brabandere, M ;
Dimpoulos, J ;
Dumas, I ;
Erickson, B ;
Lang, S ;
Nulens, A ;
Petrow, P ;
Rownd, J ;
Kirisits, C .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 78 (01) :67-77