The surgical outcome of decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

被引:20
|
作者
Masuda, Kenji [1 ]
Higashi, Takayuki [1 ]
Yamada, Katsutaka [1 ]
Sekiya, Tatsuhiro [1 ]
Saito, Tomoyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
degenerative lumbar scoliosis; decompression; short segmental fusion; criteria for intervertebral instability; SPINAL DEFORMITY; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17879
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of radiological parameters for surgical decision-making in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) by comparing the clinical and radiological results after decompression or decompression and fusion surgery. METHODS The authors prospectively planned surgical treatment for 298 patients with degenerative lumbar disease between September 2005 and March 2013. The surgical method used at their institution to address intervertebral instability is precisely defined based on radiological parameters. Among 64 patients with a Cobb angle ranging from 10 degrees to 25 degrees, 57 patients who underwent follow-up for more than 2 years postoperatively were evaluated. These patients were divided into 2 groups: those in the decompression group underwent decompression alone (n = 25), and those in the fusion group underwent decompression and short segmental fusion (n = 32). Surgical outcomes were reviewed, including preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles, lumbar lordosis based on radiological parameters, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. RESULTS The JOA scores of the decompression group and fusion group improved from 5.9 +/- 1.6 to 10.0 +/- 2.8 and from 7.2 +/- 2.0 to 11.3 +/- 2.8, respectively, which was not significantly different between the groups. At the final followup, the postoperative Cobb angle in the decompression group changed from 14 degrees +/- 2.9 degrees to 14.3 degrees +/- 6.4 degrees and remained stable, while the Cobb angle in the fusion group decreased from 14.8 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees to 10.0 degrees +/- 8.5 degrees after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The patients in both groups demonstrated improved JOA scores and preserved Cobb angles after surgery. The improvement in JOA scores and preservation of Cobb angles in both groups show that the evaluation of spinal instability using radiological parameters is appropriate for surgical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 264
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Arimbawa, Ida Bagus Gede
    Pranata, Cokorda Gde Rama Adi
    Daniati, Sonia
    Putra, Made Winatra Satya
    Savio, Sherly Desnita
    Wiguna, I. Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha
    Ridia, Ketut Gede Mulyadi
    Suyasa, I. Ketut
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 7 (01): : 42 - 51
  • [42] High preoperative expectations and postoperative fulfillment of expectations two years after decompression alone and decompression plus fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Duculan, Roland
    Fong, Alex M.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Mancuso, Carol A.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (05) : 665 - 674
  • [43] Opioid Dependence and Health Care Utilization After Decompression and Fusion in Patients With Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
    Sharma, Mayur
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Sirdeshpande, Pooja
    Wang, Dengzhi
    Boakye, Maxwell
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (04) : 280 - 290
  • [44] Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wenli Chang
    Peizhi Yuwen
    Yanbing Zhu
    Ning Wei
    Chen Feng
    Yingze Zhang
    Wei Chen
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2017, 137 : 637 - 650
  • [45] Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumental fusion the NORDSTEN degenerative spondylolisthesis trial (NORDSTEN-DS); study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Austevoll, Ivar Magne
    Hermansen, Erland
    Fagerland, Morten
    Rekeland, Frode
    Solberg, Tore
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    Lonne, Greger
    Indrekvam, Kari
    Aaen, Jorn
    Grundnes, Oliver
    Hellum, Christian
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [46] Lumbar Decompression With and Without Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis With Spondylolisthesis
    Sastry, Rahul A.
    Levy, Joseph F.
    Chen, Jia-Shu
    Weil, Robert J.
    Oyelese, Adetokunbo A.
    Fridley, Jared S.
    Gokaslan, Ziya L.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (12) : 847 - 856
  • [47] Degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients: dynamic stabilization without fusion versus posterior instrumented fusion
    Di Silvestre, Mario
    Lolli, Francesco
    Bakaloudis, Georgios
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [48] Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Shahi, Pratyush
    Singh, Sumedha
    Morse, Kyle
    Maayan, Omri
    Subramanian, Tejas
    Araghi, Kasra
    Singh, Nishtha
    Tuma, Olivia C.
    Asada, Tomoyuki
    Korsun, Maximilian K.
    Dowdell, James
    Sheha, Evan D.
    Sandhu, Harvinder
    Albert, Todd J.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (10) : 3749 - 3759
  • [49] Clinical outcome following decompression and short or long instrumented fusion in lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis. A prospective case-control analysis
    Prassas, Aristeidis
    Alexiou, Georgios A.
    Pourni, Paraskevi
    Magras, John
    Tsoleka, Kalliopi
    Tsonidis, Christos A.
    Tsitsopoulos, Parmenion P.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 211
  • [50] Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Changes in Surgical Indications and Comparison of Instrumented Fusion With Two Surgical Decompression Procedures
    Inui, Toshihiko
    Murakami, Masahiro
    Nagao, Noriaki
    Miyazaki, Kouichi
    Matsuda, Kou
    Tominaga, Yoshiko
    Kitano, Masahiko
    Hasegawa, Hiroshi
    Tominaga, Shinsuke
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (01) : E15 - E24