The surgical outcome of decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

被引:20
|
作者
Masuda, Kenji [1 ]
Higashi, Takayuki [1 ]
Yamada, Katsutaka [1 ]
Sekiya, Tatsuhiro [1 ]
Saito, Tomoyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
degenerative lumbar scoliosis; decompression; short segmental fusion; criteria for intervertebral instability; SPINAL DEFORMITY; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17879
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of radiological parameters for surgical decision-making in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) by comparing the clinical and radiological results after decompression or decompression and fusion surgery. METHODS The authors prospectively planned surgical treatment for 298 patients with degenerative lumbar disease between September 2005 and March 2013. The surgical method used at their institution to address intervertebral instability is precisely defined based on radiological parameters. Among 64 patients with a Cobb angle ranging from 10 degrees to 25 degrees, 57 patients who underwent follow-up for more than 2 years postoperatively were evaluated. These patients were divided into 2 groups: those in the decompression group underwent decompression alone (n = 25), and those in the fusion group underwent decompression and short segmental fusion (n = 32). Surgical outcomes were reviewed, including preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles, lumbar lordosis based on radiological parameters, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. RESULTS The JOA scores of the decompression group and fusion group improved from 5.9 +/- 1.6 to 10.0 +/- 2.8 and from 7.2 +/- 2.0 to 11.3 +/- 2.8, respectively, which was not significantly different between the groups. At the final followup, the postoperative Cobb angle in the decompression group changed from 14 degrees +/- 2.9 degrees to 14.3 degrees +/- 6.4 degrees and remained stable, while the Cobb angle in the fusion group decreased from 14.8 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees to 10.0 degrees +/- 8.5 degrees after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The patients in both groups demonstrated improved JOA scores and preserved Cobb angles after surgery. The improvement in JOA scores and preservation of Cobb angles in both groups show that the evaluation of spinal instability using radiological parameters is appropriate for surgical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 264
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical outcome in decompression alone versus decompression and instrumented fusion in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis: a prospective cohort study
    Azizpour, Kayoumars
    Schutte, Pieter J.
    Arts, Mark P.
    Pondaag, Willem
    Bouma, Gerrit J.
    Coppes, Maarten
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 38 (05) : 573 - 584
  • [32] The Effect of Surgical Decompression and Fusion on Functional Balance in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Haddas, Ram
    Lieberman, Isador
    Block, Andrew
    Derman, Peter
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (14) : E878 - E884
  • [33] Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Fusion or Decompression Alone Results in Similar Rates of Reoperation at 5 Years
    Vorhies, John S.
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Alamin, Todd
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (01): : E74 - E79
  • [34] Decompression alone vs. decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis
    Thomas, Kenneth
    Faris, Peter
    McIntosh, Greg
    Manners, Simon
    Abraham, Edward
    Bailey, Christopher S.
    Paquet, Jerome
    Cadotte, David
    Jacobs, W. Bradley
    Rampersaud, Y. Raja
    Manson, Neil A.
    Hall, Hamilton
    Fisher, Charles G.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (10) : 1633 - 1639
  • [35] Consideration of foraminal stenosis in decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis
    Tee, Jin
    Li, Charles
    Chan, Patrick
    Etherington, Greg
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (05) : 830 - 830
  • [36] Short-segment decompression/fusion versus long-segment decompression/fusion and osteotomy for Lenke-Silva type VI adult degenerative scoliosis
    Zhang, Hao-Cong
    Yu, Hai-Long
    Yang, Hui-Feng
    Sun, Peng-Fei
    Wu, Hao-Tian
    Zhan, Yang
    Wang, Zheng
    Xiang, Liang-Bi
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 132 (21) : 2543 - 2549
  • [37] Differences in imaging and clinical characteristics are associated with higher rates of decompression-fusion versus decompression-alone in women compared to men for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Fong, Alex M.
    Duculan, Roland
    Endo, Yoshimi
    Carrino, John A.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Farmer, James C.
    Huang, Russel C.
    Sandhu, Harvinder S.
    Mancuso, Carol A.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (12) : 4184 - 4191
  • [38] Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression Alone vs Decompression Plus Instrumented Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Austevoll, Ivar Magne
    Gjestad, Rolf
    Solberg, Tore
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    Hermansen, Erland
    Rekeland, Frode
    Indrekvam, Kari
    Hellum, Christian
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (09)
  • [39] Decompression and nonfusion dynamic stabilization for spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis
    Lee, Soo Eon
    Jahng, Tae-Ahn
    Kim, Hyun-Jib
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (04) : 585 - 594
  • [40] Is There a Role for Decompression Alone for Treating Symptomatic Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Systematic Review
    Joaquim, Andrei F.
    Milano, Jeronimo B.
    Ghizoni, Enrico
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (05): : 191 - 202