The influence of learning effect on frequency doubling technology perimetry (Matrix)

被引:0
作者
Contestabile, Maria Teresa
Perdicchi, Andrea
Amodeo, Stefano
Recupero, Vincenzo
Recupero Santi, Maria
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Sch Med 1, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Sch Med 2, Rome, Italy
关键词
learning effect; frequency doubling technology; perimetry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine learning effect in healthy patients without perimetric experience, tested with the frequency doubling technology perimetry, with the new model Matrix. Patients and Methods: Frequency doubling technology in the 302 threshold mode was performed on 37 healthy subjects. Each subject was tested twice in different sessions. The test always began with the right eye (RE) and continued with the left eye (LE). To evaluate learning effect the results of the REs at the first session were compared with those of the LE. The following parameters were evaluated: foveal threshold (FT), reliability indexes, mean defect (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), glaucoma hemifield test (GHT), duration of examination. Results: At the first session the average values of RE were FT = 30.81 db, MD = - 1 db, PSD = 3.01 db, and duration of the examination = 383.27 "and of LE were FT = 30.73, MD = - 0.79 db, PSD = 2.97 db, and duration of examination 382.62." At the second session the average values of RE were FT = 32.22 db, MD = + 0.16 db, PSD 2.75 db, and duration of examination = 374.97 db. The reliability was different and the GHT between the RE and LE in the first and second session was also different. Conclusions: A learning effect was observed between the first and the second sessions and the results of the GHT appeared improved. This above all should be taken into account when considering the clinical use of this test to avoid erroneous diagnostic conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 301
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] AUTZEN T, 1990, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V68, P327
  • [2] Learning effect among perimetric novices with screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry
    Brush, MB
    Chen, PP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 137 (03) : 551 - 552
  • [3] Chauhan BC, 1999, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V40, P648
  • [4] Learning effect for frequency doubling perimetry in patients with glaucoma
    Fujimoto, N
    Minowa, K
    Miyauchi, O
    Hanawa, T
    Adachi-Usami, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 133 (02) : 269 - 270
  • [5] GLOVINSKY Y, 1991, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V32, P484
  • [6] Learning effect, normal range, and test-retest variability of Frequency Doubling Perimetry as a function of age, perimetric experience, and the presence or absence of glaucoma
    Heeg, GP
    Ponsioen, TL
    Jansonius, NM
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2003, 23 (06) : 535 - 540
  • [7] THE EFFECT OF PERIMETRIC EXPERIENCE IN NORMAL SUBJECTS
    HEIJL, A
    LINDGREN, G
    OLSSON, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 107 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [8] The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma
    Heijl, A
    Bengtsson, B
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 114 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [9] The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology
    Horani, A
    Frenkel, S
    Yahalom, C
    Farber, MD
    Ticho, U
    Blumenthal, EZ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2002, 11 (06) : 511 - 516
  • [10] Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique
    Iester, M
    Capris, P
    Pandolfo, A
    Zingirian, M
    Traverso, CE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 130 (02) : 160 - 164