A study on quality assessment of the surface EEG signal based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method

被引:11
作者
Liu, Dan [1 ]
Wang, Qisong [1 ]
Zhang, Yan [1 ]
Liu, Xin [2 ]
Lu, Jingyang [3 ]
Sun, Jinwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Elect Engn & Automat, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Transportat Sci & Engn, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[3] Intelligent Fus Technol Inc, Germantown, MD USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
EEG signal; signal quality evaluation; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; SENSOR;
D O I
10.1080/24699322.2018.1557888
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Surface EEG (Electroencephalography) signal is vulnerable to interference due to its characteristics and sampling methods. So it is of great importance to evaluate the collected EEG signal prior to use. Traditional methods usually use the impedance between skin and electrode to estimate the quality of the EEG signal, which has shortcomings such as monotonous features, high false positive rates, and poor real-time capability. Aiming at addressing these issues, this paper presents a novel model of EEG quality assessment based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method. The developed model employs amplitude, power frequency ratio, and alpha band PSD (Power Spectral Density) ratio of resting EEG signal as evaluation factors, and performs a quantitative assessment of the signal quality. Experiments show that the proposed model can significantly determine the EEG signal quality. In addition, the model is simple in implementation with low computational complexity, and is able to present the EEG quality evaluation results in real time. Before the formal measurement, collecting short-term resting EEG data, and evaluating the EEG signal quality and current signal acquisition environment using the model, the collection efficiency of qualified EEG signals can be greatly improved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Fiedler P, 2013, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P547, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609558
[2]  
Fiedler P, 2010, 12 MEDITERRANEAN C M, P418, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-13039-7_105
[3]  
Gu WJ, 2016, J COMPUTAT THEOR NAN, V13, P4625
[4]   Signal Quality Assessment Model for Wearable EEG Sensor on Prediction of Mental Stress [J].
Hu, Bin ;
Peng, Hong ;
Zhao, Qinglin ;
Hu, Bo ;
Majoe, Dennis ;
Zheng, Fang ;
Moore, Philip .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NANOBIOSCIENCE, 2015, 14 (05) :553-561
[5]   Joint Maximum Likelihood Time Delay Estimation of Unknown Event-Related Potential Signals for EEG Sensor Signal Quality Enhancement [J].
Kim, Kyungsoo ;
Lim, Sung-Ho ;
Lee, Jaeseok ;
Kang, Won-Seok ;
Moon, Cheil ;
Choi, Ji-Woong .
SENSORS, 2016, 16 (06)
[6]   Trends in EEG-BCI for daily-life: Requirements for artifact removal [J].
Minguillon, Jesus ;
Angel Lopez-Gordo, M. ;
Pelayo, Francisco .
BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2017, 31 :407-418
[7]   Towards automated quality assessment measure for EEG signals [J].
Mohamed, Shady ;
Haggag, Sherif ;
Nahavandi, Saeid ;
Haggag, Omar .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2017, 237 :281-290
[8]   Technical quality evaluation of EEG recording based on electroencephalographers' knowledge [J].
Nakamura, M ;
Chen, Q ;
Sugi, T ;
Ikeda, A ;
Shibasaki, H .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2005, 27 (01) :93-100
[9]  
Nathan V, 2014, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P3755, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944440
[10]  
Tautan Alexandra-Maria, 2014, 7th International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices (BIODEVICES 2014). Proceedings, P12