Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: Energy and carbon emission footprint

被引:93
作者
Fan, Yee Van [1 ]
Klemes, Jiri Jaromir [1 ]
Lee, Chew Tin [2 ]
Perry, Simon [3 ]
机构
[1] Brno Univ Technol VUT Brno, SPIL, NETME Ctr, Fac Mech Engn,Tech 2896 2, Brno 61669, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Chem & Energy Engn, Dept Bioproc Engn, Utm Johor Bahru 81310, Johor, Malaysia
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Proc Integrat, Sch Chem Engn & Analyt Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Municipal solid waste; Energy efficiency; Carbon emissions footprint; Anaerobic digestion; Pre-treatment; Post-treatment; PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION; BIOGAS UPGRADING PROCESS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; FOOD WASTE; ORGANIC FRACTION; TO-ENERGY; HYDROTHERMAL PRETREATMENT; LIQUID FRACTION; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; CO-DIGESTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion (AD) serves as a promising alternative for waste treatment and a potential solution to improve the energy supply security. The feasibility of AD has been proven in some of the technologically and agriculturally advanced countries. However, development is still needed for worldwide implementation, especially for AD process dealing with municipal solid waste (MSW). This paper reviews various approaches and stages in the AD of MSW, which used to optimise the biogas production and quality. The assessed stages include pre-treatment, digestion process, post-treatment as well as the waste collection and transportation. The latest approaches and integrated system to improve the AD process are also presented. The stages were assessed in a relatively quantitative manner. The range of energy requirement, carbon emission footprint and the percentage of enhancement are summarised. Thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment is identified to be less suitable for MSW (- 5% to +15.4% enhancement), unless conducted in the two-phase AD system. Microwave pre-treatment shows consistent performance in elevating the biogas production of MSW, but the energy consumption (114.24-8,040 kW(e)h t(-1)) and carbon emission footprint (59.93-4,217.78 kg CO2 t(-1) waste) are relatively high. Chemical (similar to 0.43 kW(e)h m(-3)) and membrane-based (similar to 0.45 kW(e)h m(-3)) post-treatments are suggested to be a lower energy consumption approach for upgrading the biogas. The feasibility in terms of cost (scale up) and other environmental impacts (non-CO2 footprint) needs to be further assessed. This study provides an overview to facilitate further development and extended implementation of AD.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 897
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   A Review on Optimization Production and Upgrading Biogas Through CO2 Removal Using Various Techniques [J].
Andriani, Dian ;
Wresta, Arini ;
Atmaja, Tinton Dwi ;
Saepudin, Aep .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 172 (04) :1909-1928
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CONV FACT
[4]   Biowaste-to-biomethane or biowaste-to-energy? An LCA study on anaerobic digestion of organic waste [J].
Ardolino, Filomena ;
Parrillo, Francesco ;
Arena, Umberto .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 :462-476
[5]   Enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste by thermal and ozonation pretreatment methods [J].
Ariunbaatar, Javkhlan ;
Panico, Antonio ;
Frunzo, Luigi ;
Esposito, Giovanni ;
Lens, Piet N. L. ;
Pirozzi, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 146 :142-149
[6]   Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste [J].
Ariunbaatar, Javkhlan ;
Panico, Antonio ;
Esposito, Giovanni ;
Pirozzi, Francesco ;
Lens, Piet N. L. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 123 :143-156
[7]   Pressure swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. A new process configuration for the separation of biomethane and carbon dioxide [J].
Augelletti, Rosaria ;
Conti, Maria ;
Annesini, Maria Cristina .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 :1390-1398
[8]   CARBON FOOTPRINT OF ELECTRICITY FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PLANTS IN ITALY [J].
Bacenetti, Jacopo ;
Fiala, Marco .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 14 (07) :1495-1502
[9]   Biogas upgrading - technology overview, comparison and perspectives for the future [J].
Bauer, Fredric ;
Persson, Tobias ;
Hulteberg, Christian ;
Tamm, Daniel .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2013, 7 (05) :499-511
[10]   Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production [J].
Berglund, M ;
Börjesson, P .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (03) :254-266