ON THE CULTURAL AUTHORITY OF SCIENCE IN PANDEMIC TIMES AND THE CULTURAL POST- NORMALITY OF MEXICO

被引:0
作者
Navarro, Daniela Tarhuni [1 ]
Merino, Noemi Sanz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
[2] Univ les Illes Balears, Palma De Mallorca, Spain
关键词
Post-normality; public understanding of science; cultural diversity; pandemic inequality; PERCEPTION; COVID-19;
D O I
10.3989/arbor.2022.806007
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Recent national surveys in Mexico show an in-crease in acceptance of pseudo-scientific beliefs and practices, as well as a negative public perception of the social visibility of scientists. The COVID-19 pandemic has created a post-normal context that allows us to analyse the relevance that Mexican citizens confer upon science and scientists in times of crisis. This paper presents the results of two 2020 studies on public perception of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the role of science in fighting it, done on two very different population groups in Mexico: the rural (mostly indigenous) population and the urban population. We compare the results from these studies with other national studies on public understanding of science conducted before the pandemic. In this comparison, we use the indicators Progress, Reserves, Knowledge and Engage-ment, as recently proposed by Bauer et al., as a way of ana-lysing science's so-called cultural authority. Our study indicates that in this post-normal sociosanitary situation most citizens, as a general rule, show trust in science and recognize its so-cial legitimacy. Finally, in light of some specific results, we ar-gue that the cultural disparities prevalent in Mexico should be considered especially significant in trying to take advantage of science's current social prestige in order to improve the social appropriation of scientific culture in Mexico in general, that is, beyond specific post-normal contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Encuesta Nacional sobre Disponibilidad y Uso de Tecnologias de la Informacion en los Hogares (ENDUTIH) 2018
[2]  
Bauer Martin W., 2018, CULTURAL AUTHORITY S, DOI [10.4324/9781315163284, DOI 10.4324/9781315163284]
[3]  
Bauer Martin W., 2012, CULTURE SCI PUBLIC R, DOI [10.4324/9780203813621, DOI 10.4324/9780203813621]
[4]   Public Perception and Communication of Scientific Uncertainty [J].
Broomell, Stephen B. ;
Kane, Patrick Bodilly .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2017, 146 (02) :286-304
[5]   Social Science for What? Battles Over Public Funding for the 'Other Sciences' at the National Science Foundation [J].
Bucchi, Massimiano .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2021, 30 (06) :807-808
[6]  
Carnalla M, 2021, SALUD PUBLICA MEXICO, V63, P598, DOI 10.21149/12696
[7]  
Conacyt, 2020, LLAM MIEMBR SIST NAC
[8]  
Conacyt (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia), 2017, ENC PERC PUBL CIENC
[9]  
DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federacion), 2020, DECR QUE SE EST MED
[10]  
EC (European Communities), 2008, PUBL ENG SCI REP SCI