The Prognostic Impact of High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity with Aspirin or ADP Receptor Antagonists: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:13
作者
D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio [1 ]
Barbero, Umberto [1 ]
Bisi, Marta [1 ]
Moretti, Claudio [1 ]
Omede, Pierluigi [1 ]
Cerrato, Enrico [1 ]
Quadri, Giorgio [1 ]
Conrotto, Federico [1 ]
Zoccai, Giuseppe Biondi [2 ]
DiNicolantonio, James J. [3 ]
Gasparini, Mauro [4 ]
Bangalore, Sripal [5 ]
Gaita, Fiorenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Citta Salute & Sci, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Medicosurg Sci & Biotechnol, Latina, Italy
[3] St Lukes Hosp, Mid Amer Heart Inst, Kansas City, MO 64111 USA
[4] Politecn Torino, Turin, Italy
[5] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; OF-CARE ASSAY; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; INCREASED RISK; COLLABORATIVE METAANALYSIS; FUNCTION TESTS;
D O I
10.1155/2014/610296
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objective. Negative results of recent randomized clinical trials testing the hypothesis of target therapy for patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HOPR) have questioned its independent impact on clinical outcomes. 26 studies with 28.178 patients were included, with amedian age of 66.8 (64-68) and 22.7% (22.4-27.8), of female gender. After amedian follow-up of 1 year (0.1-1), cardiac adverse events occurred in 8.3% (3-11; all results are reported as median and interquartile range) of patients. Pooling all studies together, on-treatment platelet reactivity significantly increased the risk of adverse events (OR 1.33 [1.09, 1.64], I-2 = 0%). However, a sensitivity analysis showed that HOPR did not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with ACS, AMI, or stable angina as well as patients resistant to aspirin, ADP antagonists, or both. For all studies, publication bias was formally evident; after adjusting for this, HOPR did not significantly increase adverse cardiac events (OR 1.1 : 0.89-1.22, I-2 0%). Conclusions. After adjusting for clinical confounders (like risk factors and clinical presentation) and for relevant publication bias, HOPR was not an independent prognostic indicator in unselected patients with both stable and unstable coronary disease for an adverse cardiac event. The clinical importance of HOPR for high-risk populations remains to be assessed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[51]  
Tourmousoglou C. E., 2008, Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, V6, P312, DOI 10.2174/187152508785909483
[52]   A Randomized Trial of Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With High Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents Results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity In Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy With Prasugrel) Study [J].
Trenk, Dietmar ;
Stone, Gregg W. ;
Gawaz, Meinrad ;
Kastrati, Adnan ;
Angiolillo, Dominick J. ;
Mueller, Ulrike ;
Richardt, Gert ;
Jakubowski, Joseph A. ;
Neumann, Franz-Josef .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (24) :2159-2164
[53]   Bias in Associations of Emerging Biomarkers With Cardiovascular Disease [J].
Tzoulaki, Ioanna ;
Siontis, Konstantinos C. ;
Evangelou, Evangelos ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (08) :664-671