Comparison of Two Analytical Methods for Calculating the Maximum Mechanical Stress in the Rotor of High-Speed-Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Machines

被引:15
作者
Kleilat, Iman [1 ]
Benkara, Khadija El Kadri [1 ]
Friedrich, Guy [1 ]
Vivier, Stephane [1 ]
Moubayed, Nazih [2 ]
Dib, Rabih [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Compiegne, Roberval Lab, Sorbonne Univ, F-60200 Compiegne, France
[2] Lebanese Univ, Dept Elect & Elect, Fac Engn 1, Tripoli 1300, Lebanon
[3] Lebanese Univ, Fac Engn 1, Dept Mech Engn, Tripoli 1300, Lebanon
关键词
Bridges; Stress; Rotors; Iron; Magnetomechanical effects; Air gaps; Saturation magnetization; Assisted synchronous reluctance machine (SynRM); finite element analysis; maximum mechanical stress (MMS); stress concentration factor;
D O I
10.1109/TIA.2020.3040946
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Embedded applications like electric and hybrid vehicles are increasingly using electrical machines with a very high power/mass ratio. In this context, the design of such machines, very often operating at high speeds, becomes essential. However, in order to remain economically attractive, these machines cannot use rare earth magnets but at best include (low cost) ferrites. In this context, a significant number of publications have shown that synchronous reluctance machine (SynRM) may be a good choice. However, this type of machine gives poor performances due to the difficulty to get high saliency ratio. This saliency ratio may be improved by the use of low-cost ferrites that saturate the rotor magnetic bridges. The determination of the height of the magnetic bridges becomes then a problem of the prime importance to ensure both high-speed integrity and high saliency ratio. This article proposes a fast model based on the "Beam Theory Method (BTM)," which is intended to be integrated in an electromechanical optimization process. This method will be compared to another one that has been previously introduced for this type of problem: the equivalent ring method. The maximum mechanical stress at critical regions of the rotor of the assisted SynRM can then be calculated for different rotating speeds and rotor iron bridge thicknesses. By adopting the concept of stress concentration, both methods are compared with the results of finite element analyses. Finally, a prototype of the assisted SynRM is used to validate these results from finite element simulations.
引用
收藏
页码:1344 / 1353
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 2017 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference (IEMDC), DOI DOI 10.1109/IEMDC.2017.8002066
[2]   Interior PM Machines Using Ferrite to Replace Rare-Earth Surface PM Machines [J].
Barcaro, Massimo ;
Bianchi, Nicola .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2014, 50 (02) :979-985
[3]   Permanent-Magnet Optimization in Permanent-Magnet-Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor for a Wide Constant-Power Speed Range [J].
Barcaro, Massimo ;
Bianchi, Nicola ;
Magnussen, Freddy .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2012, 59 (06) :2495-2502
[4]   Fixation of buried and surface-mounted magnets in high-speed permanent-magnet synchronous machines [J].
Binder, Andreas ;
Schneider, Tobias ;
Klohr, Markus .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2006, 42 (04) :1031-1037
[5]  
Burnand G, 2019, IEEE ENER CONV, P5251, DOI [10.1109/ecce.2019.8913079, 10.1109/ECCE.2019.8913079]
[6]   Calculation of the Maximum Mechanical Stress on the Rotor of Interior Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motors [J].
Chai, Feng ;
Li, Yi ;
Liang, Peixin ;
Pei, Yulong .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2016, 63 (06) :3420-3432
[7]  
Chu GY, 2018, IEEE ENER CONV, P255, DOI 10.1109/ECCE.2018.8557418
[8]   Innovative Design for Flux Leakage Reduction in IPM Machines [J].
Cirani, Maddalena ;
Eriksson, Sture ;
Thunberg, Jonas .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2014, 50 (03) :1847-1853
[9]   Design Optimization of a High-Speed Synchronous Reluctance Machine [J].
Di Nardo, Mauro ;
Lo Calzo, Giovanni ;
Galea, Michael ;
Gerada, Chris .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2018, 54 (01) :233-243
[10]  
Fatemi A, 2018, IEEE ENER CONV, P2278, DOI 10.1109/ECCE.2018.8557947