Integrating horizon scanning and strategic risk prioritisation using a weight of evidence framework to inform policy decisions

被引:20
作者
Garnett, K. [1 ]
Lickorish, F. A. [1 ]
Rocks, S. A. [1 ]
Prpich, G. [1 ]
Rathe, A. A. [1 ]
Pollard, S. J. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Energy Environm & Agrifood, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Horizon scanning; Policy; Strategic decision-making; Risk; Prioritisation; Futures; UTILITY MASTER PLANS; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; INNOVATION POLICY; FUTURE; MANAGEMENT; SCENARIOS; ASSESSMENTS; CHALLENGES; CAUSATION; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.040
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Poor connection between data on emerging issues and credible policy decisions continues to challenge governments, and is only likely to grow as demands on time and resources increase. Here we summarise recent efforts to integrate horizon scanning and risk prioritisation approaches to better connect emerging issues to the political discourse on environmental and food-related issues. Our categorisation of insights including potential future risks and opportunities to inform policy discussions has emerged from a structured three-year programme of horizon scanning for a UK pan-governmental futures partnership led by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Our efforts to integrate horizon scanning and risk prioritisation, utilising a qualitative weight of evidence framework, has created a systematic process for identifying all signals of potential future change with significant impact for the strategic mission and underlying values of policy actors. Our approach encourages an exploration of factors out of the control of organisations, recognising that resilience depends on the flexibility of management strategies and the preparedness to deal with a variety of unexpected outcomes. We discuss how this approach addresses key cultural and evaluative challenges that policy actors have had in embedding horizon scanning in evidence-based policy processes, and suggest further developments to build confidence in the use of horizon scanning for strategic planning. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 91
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   On concepts and methods in horizon scanning: Lessons from initiating policy dialogues on emerging issues [J].
Amanatidou, Effie ;
Butter, Maurits ;
Carabias, Vicente ;
Koennoelae, Totti ;
Leis, Miriam ;
Saritas, Ozcan ;
Schaper-Rinkel, Petra ;
van Rij, Victor .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2012, 39 (02) :208-221
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, REV CROSS GOVT HORIZ
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The Delphi Method
[4]   Weight-of-evidence approaches for assessing ecosystem impairment [J].
Burton, GA ;
Chapman, PM ;
Smith, EP .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 8 (07) :1657-1673
[5]  
Campbell S., 2007, ANAL POLICY EVIDENCE
[6]   Weight-of-evidence issues and frameworks for sediment quality (and other) assessments [J].
Chapman, PM ;
McDonald, BG ;
Lawrence, GS .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 8 (07) :1489-1515
[7]   Strategic foresight: how planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making [J].
Cook, Carly N. ;
Inayatullah, Sohail ;
Burgman, Mark A. ;
Sutherland, William J. ;
Wintle, Brendan A. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (09) :531-541
[8]  
Delaney K., 2014, INNOVATION TOOLKIT P
[9]  
Delaney K, 2013, J FUTURES STUD, V17, P55
[10]   Trends in risk assessment and risk management [J].
Eduljee, GH .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 249 (1-3) :13-23