FEASIBILITY OF THE PREOPERATIVE MALLAMPATI AIRWAY ASSESSMENT IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS

被引:32
作者
Bair, Aaron E. [1 ]
Caravelli, Rebekah [2 ]
Tyler, Katren [1 ]
Laurin, Erik G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Emergency Med Serv, Sacramento, CA USA
关键词
airway management; preoperative assessment; emergency intubation; DIFFICULT TRACHEAL INTUBATION; CLINICAL SIGN; PREDICTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.12.019
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Multiple predictors have been proposed to assist in identifying patient features that would predict difficult airway management. The Mallampati score (MS) has been shown to be useful in the preoperative assessment of patients being intubated in the operating room. Objective: We sought to define the feasibility of this assessment in the Emergency Department. Methods: A prospective, observational study was performed on all patients being intubated at a university Level I trauma center over a period of 6 months. We recorded and calculated the proportion of patients who were successfully assessed using the MS. Reasons given by individual intubators for failure to assess were recorded. We also tracked patient characteristics between groups and complication rates. Results: Of 328 patients, 32 (10%) were excluded due to incomplete data. Among the remaining 296, 58% were intubated for non-trauma indications, 70% were male, and the mean age was 45.9 years. Only 76 of 296 (26%) (95% confidence interval 21-31%) were able to have the MS performed. Lack of patient cooperation and clinical instability were listed as factors that precluded evaluation in patients whose assessment was unsuccessful. The frequency of procedure-related minor events did not differ significantly between the assessed and non-assessed groups. Major events included two cricothyrotomies in the non-assessed group. Conclusions: We were unable to perform a Mallampati assessment in three-quarters of our patients requiring emergency intubation. These findings call into question the feasibility of the standard Mallampati assessment in the practice of Emergency Medicine. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 680
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   PREDICTING DIFFICULT INTUBATION [J].
BELLHOUSE, CP ;
DORE, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 62 (04) :469-469
[2]   Emergency video-assisted laryngoscopy national emergency airway registry (NEAR) V: An initial report of 81 intubations [J].
Brown, C. A. ;
Bair, A. E. ;
Laurin, E. G. ;
Shewakramani, S. ;
Walls, R. M. .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 50 (03) :S110-S110
[3]   DIFFICULT DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY COMPLICATING INTUBATION FOR ANAESTHESIA [J].
CASS, NM ;
JAMES, NR ;
LINES, V .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1956, 1 (MAR3) :488-489
[4]   Preoperative airway assessment: Predictive value of a multivariate risk index [J].
ElGanzouri, AR ;
McCarthy, RJ ;
Tuman, KJ ;
Tanck, EN ;
Ivankovich, AD .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (06) :1197-1204
[5]   The use of the GlideScope® for tracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis [J].
Lai, H. Y. ;
Chen, I. H. ;
Chen, A. ;
Hwang, F. Y. ;
Lee, Y. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 97 (03) :419-422
[6]   Limitations of difficult airway prediction in patients intubated in the emergency department [J].
Levitan, RM ;
Everett, WW ;
Ochroch, EA .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 44 (04) :307-313
[7]  
Lutes MHL, 2004, CLIN PROCEDURES EMER, P69
[8]   Evaluation of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation [J].
Maharaj, C. H. ;
Costello, J. F. ;
Harte, B. H. ;
Laffey, J. G. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 63 (02) :182-188
[9]   CLINICAL SIGN TO PREDICT DIFFICULT TRACHEAL INTUBATION (HYPOTHESIS) [J].
MALLAMPATI, SR .
CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1983, 30 (03) :316-317
[10]   A CLINICAL SIGN TO PREDICT DIFFICULT TRACHEAL INTUBATION - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
MALLAMPATI, SR ;
GATT, SP ;
GUGINO, LD ;
DESAI, SP ;
WARAKSA, B ;
FREIBERGER, D ;
LIU, PL .
CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1985, 32 (04) :429-434