Robustness Improvement of Hyperspectral Image Unmixing by Spatial Second-Order Regularization

被引:12
作者
Bauer, Sebastian [1 ]
Stefan, Johannes [1 ]
Michelsburg, Matthias [1 ]
Laengle, Thomas [2 ]
Leon, Fernando Puente [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Ind Informat Technol, D-76187 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Optron Syst Technol & Image Explo, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
Hyperspectral image; unmixing; denoising; total variation; Hessian; regularization; ENDMEMBER EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.1109/TIP.2014.2362008
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The acquisition of hundreds of images of a scene, each at a different wavelength, is known as hyperspectral imaging. This high amount of data allows the extraction of much more information from hyperspectral images compared with conventional color images. The forward-looking imaging approach emerged from remote sensing, but is still not very widespread in industrial and other practical applications. Spectral unmixing, in particular, aims at the determination of the components present in a scene as well as the abundance to which each component contributes. This information is valuable, for instance, when discrimination tasks are to be performed. Involving not only spectral, but also spatial information was found to have the potential to improve the unmixing results. Several publications use spatial first-order regularization (closely related to the total variation approach) to incorporate this spatial information. Like in classical image processing, this approach favors piecewise constant pixel transitions. This is why it was proposed in the literature to use second-order regularization instead of first order to approach piecewise-linear transitions. Therefore, we introduce Hessian-based regularization to hyperspectral unmixing and propose an algorithm to calculate the regularized result. We use simulated data and images measured in our laboratory to show that both the first-and second-order approaches share many properties and produce similar results. The second-order approach, however, is more robust and thus more accurate in finding the minimum. Both methods smoothen the images in the case of supervised unmixing (i.e., the component spectra are known beforehand) and enhance unsupervised unmixing (when the spectra are not known).
引用
收藏
页码:5209 / 5221
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Athena scientific Belmont
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, USGS NUMBERED SERIES, DOI DOI 10.3133/DS231
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, FRONT APP M
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, IGARSS 2008, DOI DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779330
[5]   Unmixing of Hyperspectral Images using Bayesian Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Volume Prior [J].
Arngren, Morten ;
Schmidt, Mikkel N. ;
Larsen, Jan .
JOURNAL OF SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS FOR SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 65 (03) :479-496
[6]   A Second-Order Model for Image Denoising [J].
Bergounioux, Maitine ;
Piffet, Loic .
SET-VALUED AND VARIATIONAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 18 (3-4) :277-306
[7]   Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches [J].
Bioucas-Dias, Jose M. ;
Plaza, Antonio ;
Dobigeon, Nicolas ;
Parente, Mario ;
Du, Qian ;
Gader, Paul ;
Chanussot, Jocelyn .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 5 (02) :354-379
[8]  
Boyd S., 2004, CONVEX OPTIMIZATION
[9]   Spatially Adaptive Hyperspectral Unmixing [J].
Canham, Kelly ;
Schlamm, Ariel ;
Ziemann, Amanda ;
Basener, Bill ;
Messinger, David .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 49 (11) :4248-4262
[10]  
Chen Y., 2011, PROJECTIONS SIMPLEX