A Single Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device for the Treatment of Large and Giant Anterior Circulation Intracranial Aneurysms

被引:2
|
作者
Choi, Jai Ho [1 ]
Sim, Sook Young [2 ]
Shin, Yong Sam [1 ]
Chung, Joonho [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Inje Univ, Ilsan Paik Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Neurosurg, Goyang, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Endovascular treatment; flow diverter; intracranial aneurysm; stent; PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; CEREBRAL-ARTERY ANEURYSMS; DIVERTOR STENTS; COMPLICATIONS; COILING; DIVERSION;
D O I
10.3349/ymj.2022.63.4.349
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report the author's experiences in treating large (10-25 mm) and giant (>25 mm) intracranial aneurysms (IAs) using a single Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) without assistant coiling, with a focus on procedure-related complications. Materials and Methods: A total of 33 patients who were treated with FRED between January 2018 and July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The timing of procedure-related complications was chronologically categorized as acute (within 7 days), subacute (8 to 21 days), and delayed (after 21 days) periods. Follow-up angiography was performed at 2 to 27 months (mean 9.7 months), and clinical follow-up was performed at 1 to 31 months (mean 14.1 months) in all patients. Results: Six (18.2%) patients experienced procedure-related complications, including 2 (6.1%) in acute period, 1 (3.0%) in subacute period, and 3 (9.1%) in delayed period. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 5 (15.2%) patients and hemorrhagic complications in 1(3.0%). Permanent morbidity and mortality rates were 3.0% each. Non-internal carotid artery (ICA) location of IAs (odds ratio 6.532; 95% confidence interval, 1.335-17.816; p=0.034) was the only independent risk factor for procedure-related complications on multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: The procedure-related complication rate was 18.2% in this study. Procedure-related complications might increase when treating large and giant IAs located on a non-ICA, especially on the middle cerebral artery. Therefore, it may be suggested that neurointerventionists and endovascular neurosurgeons should pay attention to the location of IAs when treating large and giant IAs with a single FRED.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 356
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Early experience with flow diverting endoluminal stents for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
    Walcott, Brian P.
    Pisapia, Jared M.
    Nahed, Brian V.
    Kahle, Kristopher T.
    Ogilvy, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 18 (07) : 891 - 894
  • [32] A single-centre experience and literature review of Flow Re-Directional Endoluminal Device (FRED) in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms
    Gan, C. L.
    Yang, Z.
    Salahia, G.
    Halpin, S.
    Nair, S.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 76 (03) : 238.e1 - 238.e8
  • [33] Comparison of pipeline embolization device and flow redirection endoluminal device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Musmar, Basel
    Orscelik, Atakan
    Salim, Hamza
    Musmar, Fares
    Adeeb, Nimer
    El Naamani, Kareem
    Essibayi, Muhammed Amir
    Spellicy, Samantha
    Abdelgadir, Jihad
    Dmytriw, Adam A.
    Patel, Aman B.
    Pereira, Vitor Mendes
    Cuellar-Saenz, Hugo H.
    Guthikonda, Bharat
    Zomorodi, Ali
    Jabbour, Pascal
    Hasan, David
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [34] Clipping of Large and Giant Aneurysms of Anterior Circulation
    Kars, Hamit Zafer
    Gurelik, Mustafa
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 21 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [35] Difference in the cumulative incidence of aneurysmal occlusion by Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device and Pipeline Embolization Device in the treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study
    Hidetoshi Matsukawa
    Kazutaka Uchida
    Saujanya Rajbhandari
    Manabu Shirakawa
    Shinichi Yoshimura
    Neurosurgical Review, 46
  • [36] Endoluminal flow diversion as a primary treatment strategy for pediatric traumatic intracranial aneurysms: a case-based review of literature
    Hosseini, Ehsan Mohammad
    Zafarshamspour, Saber
    Ghasemi-Rad, Mohammad
    Benndorf, Goetz
    Rasekhi, Alireza
    Rafieossadat, Reza
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2024, 40 (02) : 345 - 357
  • [37] Difference in the cumulative incidence of aneurysmal occlusion by Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device and Pipeline Embolization Device in the treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study
    Matsukawa, Hidetoshi
    Uchida, Kazutaka
    Rajbhandari, Saujanya
    Shirakawa, Manabu
    Yoshimura, Shinichi
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [38] Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) with or without Adjunctive Coiling in Treatment of Very Large and Giant Cerebral Aneurysms
    Sedat Giray Kandemirli
    Feyyaz Baltacioglu
    Jessica Jesser
    Osman Kizilkilic
    Civan Islak
    Markus Möhlenbruch
    Naci Kocer
    Clinical Neuroradiology, 2022, 32 : 471 - 480
  • [39] Abnormal foreshortening of a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device caused by in-stent thrombosis immediately after deployment br
    Otsuka, Takafumi
    Izumi, Takashi
    Nishihori, Masahiro
    Tsukada, Tetsuya
    Goto, Shunsaku
    Ikezawa, Mizuka
    Kato, Naoki
    Nakano, Mizuki
    Uda, Kenji
    Yokoyama, Kinya
    Araki, Yoshio
    Saito, Ryuta
    NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 84 (04) : 884 - 889
  • [40] Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Anterior Circulation Aneurysms with Flow Diverters: A Single Centre Experience with Mid- and Long-Term Results
    Yaltirik Bilgin, Ezel
    Onal, Baran
    Emmez, Hakan
    Akkan, Korey
    Ilgit, Erhan
    Bilgin, Erkan
    Cindil, Emetullah
    Borcek, Alp Ozgun
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 28 (04) : 550 - 556