Twelve Threats of Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) for Animal Welfare

被引:53
作者
Tuyttens, Frank A. M. [1 ,2 ]
Molento, Carla F. M. [3 ]
Benaissa, Said [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Flanders Res Inst Agr, Fisheries & Food ILVO, Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Vet & Biosci, Merelbeke, Belgium
[3] Univ Fed Parana, Anim Welf Lab, Curitiba, Brazil
[4] Ghent Univ imec, Dept Informat Technol, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
animal well-being; automation; digital agriculture; ethics; internet of things; sensors; smart farming; technology; DAIRY-COWS; RISK-FACTORS; FARMERS; ATTITUDES; HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; EXPERIENCES; CITIZENS; CHICKENS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2022.889623
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Research and development of Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) is booming, partly due to hopes and claims regarding the benefits of PLF for animal welfare. These claims remain largely unproven, however, as only few PLF technologies focusing on animal welfare have been commercialized and adopted in practice. The prevailing enthusiasm and optimism about PLF innovations may be clouding the perception of possible threats that PLF may pose to farm animal welfare. Without claiming to be exhaustive, this paper lists 12 potential threats grouped into four categories: direct harm, indirect harm via the end-user, via changes to housing and management, and via ethical stagnation or degradation. PLF can directly harm the animals because of (1) technical failures, (2) harmful effects of exposure, adaptation or wearing of hardware components, (3) inaccurate predictions and decisions due to poor external validation, and (4) lack of uptake of the most meaningful indicators for animal welfare. PLF may create indirect effects on animal welfare if the farmer or stockperson (5) becomes under- or over-reliant on PLF technology, (6) spends less (quality) time with the animals, and (7) loses animal-oriented husbandry skills. PLF may also compromise the interests of the animals by creating transformations in animal farming so that the housing and management are (8) adapted to optimize PLF performance or (9) become more industrialized. Finally, PLF may affect the moral status of farm animals in society by leading to (10) increased speciesism, (11) further animal instrumentalization, and (12) increased animal consumption and harm. For the direct threats, possibilities for prevention and remedies are suggested. As the direction and magnitude of the more indirect threats are harder to predict or prevent, they are more difficult to address. In order to maximize the potential of PLF for improving animal welfare, the potential threats as well as the opportunities should be acknowledged, monitored and addressed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   A Survey of Italian Dairy Farmers' Propensity for Precision Livestock Farming Tools [J].
Abeni, Fabio ;
Petrera, Francesca ;
Galli, Andrea .
ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (05)
[2]  
Adebayo A., 2015, WEIGHING SCALES SECR
[3]  
Allport GW., 1958, NATURE PREJUDICE GOR, pA149
[4]   Q Fever Dairy Herd Status Determination Based on Serological and Molecular Analysis of Bulk Tank Milk [J].
Anastacio, S. ;
Carolino, N. ;
Sidi-Boumedine, K. ;
da Silva, G. J. .
TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2016, 63 (02) :E293-E300
[5]   Farmers Under Pressure. Analysis of the Social Conditions of Cases of Animal Neglect [J].
Andrade, Stefan B. ;
Anneberg, Inger .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2014, 27 (01) :103-126
[6]  
Anil L, 2006, CAN J VET RES, V70, P128
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, INT J SOCIOLOGY FOOD
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 2012 NATL MASTITIS C
[9]   ENHANCING CHILDRENS ATTITUDES ABOUT THE HUMANE TREATMENT OF ANIMALS - GENERALIZATION TO HUMAN-DIRECTED EMPATHY [J].
ASCIONE, FR .
ANTHROZOOS, 1992, 5 (03) :176-191
[10]   Invited review: Changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare [J].
Barkema, H. W. ;
von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. ;
Kastelic, J. P. ;
Lam, T. J. G. M. ;
Luby, C. ;
Roy, J. -P. ;
LeBlanc, S. J. ;
Keefe, G. P. ;
Kelton, D. F. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (11) :7426-7445