Techno-economic modelling of large scale compressed air energy storage systems

被引：20

作者：

Huang, Y. ^{[1
]}

Chen, H. S. ^{[2
]}

Zhang, X. J. ^{[2
]}

Keatley, P. ^{[1
]}

Huang, M. J. ^{[1
]}

Vorushylo, I. ^{[1
]}

Wang, Y. D. ^{[3
]}

Hewitt, N. J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Ulster, Sch Built Environm, Ctr Sustainable Technol, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, North Ireland

[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Engn Thermophys, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China

[3] Newcastle Univ, Sir Joseph Swan Ctr Energy Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England

来源：

8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016) | 2017年 / 105卷

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Adiabatic compressed air energy storage; Conventional compressed air energy storage; Techno-economic analysis; Process modelling; Break-even electricity selling price;

D O I：

10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.851

中图分类号：

TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];

学科分类号：

0807 ; 0820 ;

摘要：

Interest in integrating energy storage systems into the power grid has increased in Europe over the past decade due to strategies to overcome the intermittent nature of renewable electricity sources. One of these technologies is compressed air energy storage (CAES). The main purpose of this paper is to examine the technical and economic potential of CAES systems. In this work, two configurations a) Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage (A-CAES); and b) Conventional Compressed Air Energy Storage (C-CAES) were modelled using the ECLIPSE suite of process simulation software. The nominal compression and power generation of both systems were given at 100MWe and 140MWe respectively. For each mode of operation an energy analysis was carried out. Energy use was calculated and compared for each system mode. Based on the results of mass and energy balances, an economic evaluation of the systems was conducted. Technical results showed that the overall efficiency of the A-CAES system would be 64.7%, considerably better than that of the C-CAES system at 52.6%. However it could be seen in the economic analysis that the breakeven electricity selling price (BESP) of the A-CAES system was 152(sic)/MWh, much higher than that of the C-CAES system at 95(sic)/MWh on average. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

引用

页数：6

共 4 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2014, Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014

[2]

Evans D., 2006, IR06095 BGS

[3] Compressed air energy storage (CAES) with compressors distributed at heat loads to enable waste heat utilization [J].

Safaei, Hossein ;

Keith, David W. ;

Hugo, Ronald J. .

APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 103 :165-179

[4]

Sundkvist Sven Gunnar, 2004, 17 GREENH GAS CONTR

← 1 →