Why Do People Join Backlash Protests? Lessons from Turkey

被引:76
作者
Aytac, S. Erdem [1 ]
Schiumerini, Luis [2 ,4 ]
Stokes, Susan [3 ]
机构
[1] Koc Univ, Dept Int Relat, TR-34450 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Coll, Oxford, England
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Polit Sci, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Polit Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
repression; backlash mobilization; emotions; social movements; AFFECT SCHEDULE PANAS; COLLECTIVE ACTION; NEGATIVE AFFECT; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; CAUSAL MECHANISMS; EAST-GERMANY; REPRESSION; EMOTIONS; ANGER; ESCALATION;
D O I
10.1177/0022002716686828
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
When people learn that demonstrators are being subjected to harsh treatment by the police, sometimes their reaction is to join demonstrations. What explains the potentially mobilizing power of repression? Information-oriented theories posit that repression changes people's beliefs about the likely success of the protests or the type of the government, thus encouraging them to join. Social-psychological theories posit that repression provokes a moral and emotional reaction from bystanders, and these emotional reactions are mobilizing. Our research offers a rare opportunity to test these theories, empirically, against one another. We offer experimental evidence from Turkey after the 2013 Gezi uprising. In this setting, emotional reactions appear to be the link between repression and backlash mobilization. Information-oriented theories of backlash mobilization may be less germane in democracies, in which people already have access to information about their governments, and in highly polarized polities, in which few people's political affinities are up for grabs.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1228
页数:24
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   A theory of political transitions [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :938-963
[2]  
Acemoglu D., 2009, EC ORIGINS DICTATORS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NY TIMES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470674871.WBESPM065
[6]   Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 56 (02) :271-285
[7]   Protests and Repression in New Democracies [J].
Aytac, S. Erdem ;
Schiumerini, Luis ;
Stokes, Susan .
PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2017, 15 (01) :62-82
[8]   Varieties of Populism in a Changing Global Context The Divergent Paths of Erdogan and Kirchnerismo [J].
Aytac, S. Erdem ;
Onis, Ziya .
COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2014, 47 (01) :41-+
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]  
Beissinger M., 2002, NATIONALIST MOBILISA