Funnel plots in meta-analysis

被引:438
作者
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. [1 ]
Harbord, Roger M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Canynge Hall,Whiteladies Rd, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
关键词
st0061; metafunnel; funnel plots; meta-analysis; publication bias; small-study effects;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X0400400204
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Funnel plots are a visual tool for investigating publication and other bias in meta-analysis. They are simple scatterplots of the treatment effects estimated from individual studies (horizontal axis) against a measure of study size (vertical axis). The name "funnel plot" is based on the precision in the estimation of the underlying treatment effect increasing as the sample size of component studies increases. Therefore, in the absence of bias, results from small studies will scatter widely at the bottom of the graph, with the spread narrowing among larger studies. Publication bias (the association of publication probability with the statistical significance of study results) may lead to asymmetrical funnel plots. It is, however, important to realize that publication bias is only one of a number of possible causes of funnel-plot asymmetry-funnel plots should be seen as a generic means of examining small study effects (the tendency for the smaller studies in a meta-analysis to show larger treatment effects) rather than a tool to diagnose specific types of bias. This article introduces the metafunnel command, which produces funnel plots in Stata. In accordance with published recommendations, standard error is used as the measure of study size. Treatment effects expressed as ratio measures (for example risk ratios or odds ratios) may be plotted on a log scale.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 141
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative [J].
Poole, C ;
Greenland, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 150 (05) :469-475
[12]   EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE OF BIAS - DIMENSIONS OF METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY ASSOCIATED WITH ESTIMATES OF TREATMENT EFFECTS IN CONTROLLED TRIALS [J].
SCHULZ, KF ;
CHALMERS, I ;
HAYES, RJ ;
ALTMAN, DG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (05) :408-412
[13]  
Sharp S., 1998, STATA TECHNICAL B, V42, P16, DOI DOI 10.1002/SIM.1187/FULL)
[14]   WHO BENEFITS FROM MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS [J].
SMITH, GD ;
EGGER, M .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6921) :72-74
[15]  
Steichen TJ., 1998, STATA TECHNICAL B, V41, P9
[16]   Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects [J].
Stern, JM ;
Simes, RJ .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :640-645
[17]  
Sterne J.A., 2001, Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context, P189
[18]   Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: Power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature [J].
Sterne, JAC ;
Gavaghan, D ;
Egger, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (11) :1119-1129
[19]   Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis [J].
Sterne, JAC ;
Egger, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (10) :1046-1055
[20]   COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT - A METAANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED TRIALS [J].
STUCK, AE ;
SIU, AL ;
WIELAND, GD ;
ADAMS, J ;
RUBENSTEIN, LZ .
LANCET, 1993, 342 (8878) :1032-1036