Funnel plots in meta-analysis

被引:438
作者
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. [1 ]
Harbord, Roger M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Canynge Hall,Whiteladies Rd, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
关键词
st0061; metafunnel; funnel plots; meta-analysis; publication bias; small-study effects;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X0400400204
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Funnel plots are a visual tool for investigating publication and other bias in meta-analysis. They are simple scatterplots of the treatment effects estimated from individual studies (horizontal axis) against a measure of study size (vertical axis). The name "funnel plot" is based on the precision in the estimation of the underlying treatment effect increasing as the sample size of component studies increases. Therefore, in the absence of bias, results from small studies will scatter widely at the bottom of the graph, with the spread narrowing among larger studies. Publication bias (the association of publication probability with the statistical significance of study results) may lead to asymmetrical funnel plots. It is, however, important to realize that publication bias is only one of a number of possible causes of funnel-plot asymmetry-funnel plots should be seen as a generic means of examining small study effects (the tendency for the smaller studies in a meta-analysis to show larger treatment effects) rather than a tool to diagnose specific types of bias. This article introduces the metafunnel command, which produces funnel plots in Stata. In accordance with published recommendations, standard error is used as the measure of study size. Treatment effects expressed as ratio measures (for example risk ratios or odds ratios) may be plotted on a log scale.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 141
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Stata Technical Bulletin STB
[2]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[3]  
Bradburn MJ, 1998, STATA TECH B REPRINT, V44, P4
[4]  
Deeks JJ., 2001, Systematic reviews in healthcare: Metaanalysis in context, DOI 10.1002/9780470693926.ch16
[5]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[6]  
Egger M, 2003, Health Technol Assess, V7, P1
[7]  
Engels EA, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P1707, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1707::AID-SIM491>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-P
[9]   AN EVIDENCE BASED APPROACH TO INDIVIDUALIZING TREATMENT [J].
GLASZIOU, PP ;
IRWIG, LM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7016) :1356-1359
[10]   Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials:: empirical study [J].
Jüni, P ;
Holenstein, F ;
Sterne, J ;
Bartlett, C ;
Egger, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (01) :115-123