Epidemiology of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: Findings From a Large Nonregistry Cohort

被引:28
|
作者
Blanco-Guzman, Merilda O. [1 ]
Wang, Xiaowen [2 ]
Vader, Justin M. [3 ]
Olsen, Margaret A. [1 ]
Dubberke, Erik R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Div Infect Dis, Sch Med, 4523 Clayton Ave,Campus Box 8051, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Div Med Educ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Div Cardiol, Sch Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
device-related infection; VAD infection; driveline infection; CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; DRIVELINE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciaa011
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Infection is a major complication during circulatory support with a left ventricular assist device (VAD). Changes in device characteristics and treatment practices in the last decade can affect the epidemiology of infection. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) has published recommendations on the prevention and management of VAD infections, but data to support these recommendations remain sparse. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 455 patients who underwent VAD placement from 2009 to 2015. Infection episodes were defined using ISHLT criteria and were also grouped as endovascular or local. Analysis included descriptive statistics. Results. There were 174 patients (38.6%) with a VAD infection. Infection incidence was 36.9 cases per 100 person-years of VAD support. The driveline was the most common infection site (67.2%). Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were not satisfied in 29.2% of patients with endovascular infections, and computed tomography (CT) examinations were normal in 37.7% of cases. Gram-positive bacteria caused 65.6% of infections in patients with an available culture. Antimicrobial suppression was used in 72.3% of patients who survived treatment. Median survival after infection was 35 months for patients with VAD-related infections versus 14 months for patients with VAD-specific infections. Conclusions. VAD infections continue to be a major complication after implantation. Clinical criteria alone were not predictive of serious infections, and many patients with confirmed infection had normal CTs. Patients with VAD-specific infections had lower median survival than patients with VAD-related infections.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 197
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of antimicrobial selection for prophylaxis of left ventricular assist device surgical infections
    Nguyen, Peter T.
    Sam, Teena
    Colley, Peter
    van Zyl, Johanna S.
    Felius, Joost
    Berhe, Mezgebe
    Meyer, Dan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (09) : 3052 - 3059
  • [22] Staphylococcal driveline infections are the predominant type of left ventricular assist device associated infections in Singapore
    Teh, Yii Ean
    Lim, Choon Pin
    Teo, Louis Loon Yee
    Soon, Jia Lin
    Chao, Victor Tar Toong
    Neo, Chia Lee
    Tan, Joycelyn Li Li
    Kerk, Ka Lee
    Sim, David Kheng Leng
    Tan, Teing Ee
    Tan, Ban Hock
    Cumaraswamy, Sivathasan
    Tan, Thuan Tong
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 51 (06) : 417 - 424
  • [23] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Removal in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device Associated Infections
    Krishnamoorthy, Arun
    Pokorney, Sean D.
    Lewis, Robert K.
    Daubert, James P.
    Greenfield, Ruth A.
    Hegland, Donald D.
    Milano, Carmelo A.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    Schroder, Jacob N.
    Patel, Chetan B.
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (11) : 1199 - 1205
  • [24] Tricuspid regurgitation in left ventricular assist device patients
    Westaby, Stephen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 41 (01) : 217 - 218
  • [25] Left Ventricular Assist Device Emergencies Diagnosis and Management
    Sennhauser, Susie
    Sridharan, Lakshmi
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2024, 40 (01) : 159 - 177
  • [26] Initial Experience of Conversion of Toyobo Paracorporeal Left Ventricular Assist Device to DuraHeart Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Yoshioka, Daisuke
    Sakaguchi, Taichi
    Saito, Shunsuke
    Miyagawa, Shigeru
    Nishi, Hiroyuki
    Yoshikawa, Yasushi
    Fukushima, Satsuki
    Ueno, Takayoshi
    Kuratani, Toru
    Sawa, Yoshiki
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2012, 76 (02) : 372 - 376
  • [27] Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventricular assist device infections: findings from ineffective phage therapies in five cases
    Aslam, Saima
    Roach, Dwayne
    Nikolich, Mikeljon P.
    Biswas, Biswajit
    Schooley, Robert T.
    Lilly-Bishop, Kimberley A.
    Rice, Gregory K.
    Cer, Regina Z.
    Hamilton, Theron
    Henry, Matthew
    Luong, Tiffany
    Salabarria, Ann-Charlott
    Sisk-Hackworth, Laura
    Filippov, Andrey A.
    Lebreton, Francois
    Hall, Lindsey
    Nir-Paz, Ran
    Onallah, Hadil
    Livni, Gilat
    Shostak, Eran
    Wieder-Finesod, Anat
    Yahav, Dafna
    Yerushalmy, Ortal
    Alkalay-Oren, Sivan
    Braunstein, Ron
    Khalifa, Leron
    Rimon, Amit
    Gelman, Daniel
    Hazan, Ronen
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2024, 68 (04)
  • [28] The dominant left ventricular assist device: lessons from an era
    Alam, Amit
    Milligan, Gregory P.
    Gong, Timothy
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (06): : 5551 - 5554
  • [29] The dominant left ventricular assist device: lessons from an era
    Alam, Amit
    Milligan, Gregory P.
    Gong, Timothy
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2022, 8 (06): : 5551 - 5554
  • [30] Are Blood Stream Infections Associated With an Increased Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke in Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device?
    Aggarwal, Ashim
    Gupta, Ankit
    Kumar, Shivani
    Baumblatt, Jane A.
    Pauwaa, Sunil
    Gallagher, Colleen
    Treitman, Adam
    Pappas, Pat
    Tatooles, Antone
    Bhat, Geetha
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2012, 58 (05) : 509 - 513