Oddball distractors demand attention: Neural and behavioral responses to predictability in the flanker task

被引:11
作者
Noyce, Abigail [1 ,2 ]
Sekuler, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Brandeis Univ, Dept Psychol, Waltham, MA 02254 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Brandeis Univ, Volen Ctr Complex Syst, Waltham, MA 02254 USA
关键词
vMMN; MMN; Flankers task; Temperament; Expectation; Individual difference; VISUAL MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; ADAPTATION; CONFLICT; INHIBITION; ERRORS; MODEL; MMN;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Predictable and unpredictable distractors may differentially affect attention. We adapted the Eriksen flanker task by manipulating the probability with which specific flankers occurred. Subjects reported the orientation of briefly-presented targets while attempting to ignore four flanking items. Flankers had either standard (90% of trials) or oddball (10%) orientations. Congruent and incongruent configurations were equiprobable, as were target orientations. Oddball flanker orientations substantially enhanced congruency effects: performance was best when the target was congruent with oddball flankers and worst when it was incongruent. We recorded scalp EEG while subjects performed the task, and later computed ERPs timelocked to stimulus onset. Oddball flanker orientations evoked a visual mismatch negativity (vMMN). Subjects' temperament predicted individual differences in vMMN magnitude. Orientation sensitivity predicted larger vMMNs; attentional selectivity predicted smaller. Behavioral and vMMN results indicate that subjects exploit distractor predictability to support more-effective active inhibition; oddballs disrupt this strategy. Despite subjects' attempts to ignore the flankers, unexpected distractors strongly influence neural responses and behavioral performance. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 24
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Eye movements and imitation learning: Intentional disruption of expectation
    Maryott, Jessica
    Noyce, Abigail
    Sekuler, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2011, 11 (01):
  • [22] Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control
    Mayr, U
    Awh, E
    Laurey, P
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (05) : 450 - 452
  • [23] Mordkoff J.T., 1996, CONVERGING OPERATION, P483, DOI 10.1037/10187-018
  • [24] Resting Parietal Electroencephalogram Asymmetries and Self-Reported Attentional Control
    Morillas-Romero, Alfonso
    Tortella-Feliu, Miquel
    Bornas, Xavier
    Aguayo-Siquier, Blanca
    [J]. CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 44 (03) : 188 - 192
  • [25] The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing:: A review
    Naatanen, R.
    Paavilainen, P.
    Rinne, T.
    Alho, K.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (12) : 2544 - 2590
  • [26] ATTENTION AND MISMATCH NEGATIVITY
    NAATANEN, R
    PAAVILAINEN, P
    TIITINEN, H
    JIANG, D
    ALHO, K
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 30 (05) : 436 - 450
  • [27] Expectations Modulate the Magnitude of Attentional Capture by Auditory Events
    Nostl, Anatole
    Marsh, John E.
    Sorqvist, Patrik
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [28] FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data
    Oostenveld, Robert
    Fries, Pascal
    Maris, Eric
    Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 2011
  • [29] MMN in the visual modality: a review
    Pazo-Alvarez, P
    Cadaveira, F
    Amenedo, E
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 63 (03) : 199 - 236
  • [30] ORIENTING OF ATTENTION
    POSNER, MI
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 32 (FEB): : 3 - 25