Making Sense of Crisis: Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Leadership in Response to COVID-19

被引:58
作者
Crayne, Matthew P. [1 ]
Medeiros, Kelsey E. [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Sch Business, 1400 Washington Ave, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Coll Business Adm, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
关键词
leadership; charisma; CIP; COVID-19; PERFORMANCE; STYLE;
D O I
10.1037/amp0000715
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The incursion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reached global scale in 2020, requiring a response from leaders worldwide. Although the virus is a ubiquitous problem, world leaders have varied appreciably in their responses resulting in substantially different outcomes in terms of virus mitigation, population health, and economic stability. One explanation for this inconsistency is that leaders have taken differential approaches to making sense of the crisis that, in turn, have driven their approaches to decision making and communication. The present article elaborates on the role of leaders as sensemakers and explains how a leader's sensemaking approach is a critical element in successful crisis management efforts. Through the charismatic, ideological, pragmatic (CIP) leadership model, a sensemaking-focused theory of leadership, it is explained how specific, relatively stable sensemaking approaches manifest and what actions leaders engaged in those styles are likely to take in times of crisis. These connections are then reinforced through case examples of 3 world leaders, framed through CIP, and demonstrate how their sensemaking approach has influenced their response to COVID-19. The article concludes with a discussion of the impacts that these differential approaches to COVID-19 may have on the global community, and recommendations for more explicit incorporation of sensemaking into our understanding of leadership.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 474
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Andrusewicz M., 2015, NPR
  • [2] [Anonymous], DW
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, BBC 1022
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, Los Angeles Times
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, NEWS WIRES 0323
  • [6] Predicting Elections: Child's Play!
    Antonakis, John
    Dalgas, Olaf
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 323 (5918) : 1183 - 1183
  • [7] A meta-analytic review and future research agenda of charismatic leadership
    Banks, George C.
    Engemann, Krista N.
    Williams, Courtney E.
    Gooty, Janaki
    McCauley, Kelly Davis
    Medaugh, Melissa R.
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2017, 28 (04) : 508 - 529
  • [8] Bass B.M., 2008, The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerialapplications, V4th
  • [9] Conditions of problem-solving and the performance of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: A comparative experimental study
    Bedell-Avers, Katrina E.
    Hunter, Samuel T.
    Mumford, Michael D.
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2008, 19 (01) : 89 - 106
  • [10] Brito R., 2020, UPDATE 2 DICISIONS B