Viability and developmental time and Drosophila gouveai and Drosophila antonietae (Diptera: Drosophilidae) are dependent on the cactus host

被引:0
作者
Soto, Ignacio M.
Manfrin, Maura Helena
Sene, Fabio De Melo
Hasson, Esteban
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Lab Evoluc, Dept Ecol Genet & Evoluc, Fac Ciencias Exactas & Nat, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Biol, FFCLRP, BR-14040901 Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, FMRP, Dept Genet, BR-14049900 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
cactopbilic Drosophila; developmental time; host plants; phenotypic plasticity; viability;
D O I
10.1603/0013-8746(2007)100[490:VADTIC]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Drosophila gouveai Tidon-Sklorz & Sene and Drosophila antonietae Tidon-Sklorz & Sene (Diptera: Drosophilidae) are two cactophilic sibling species that belong to the Drosophila buzzatii cluster, which comprises seven species living in South America. D. gouveai uses the decaying stems of Cactaceae of the genus Pilosocereus as breeding sites, whereas D. antonietae is mainly associated with Cereus hildmannianus K. Schum. In this article, we investigate the effect that growing in alternative host cacti may have on fitness-related traits, developmental time and viability, relevant for species that live in ephemeral resources. Both species were reared in seminatural media prepared with fermenting tissues of either Pilosocereus machrisis Y. Dawson or C. hildmannianus. Our results show that the specific differences in the traits analyzed are host dependent. Overall, both species performed very well in P. machrisis, whereas survival in C. hildmannianus differed dramatically between species. The viability of D. antonietae was lower than in P. machrisis, whereas D. gouveai barely survived in C. hildmannianus. The results are discussed in relation to biogeographic, morphological, and molecular evidence, and they stress the need to assess the relative significance of host plant use in diversification of the D. buzzatii cluster.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 496
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Barker J.S.F., 1990, ECOLOGICAL EVOLUTION
[2]  
Barker JSF, 1982, ECOLOGICAL GENETICS
[3]   Patterns of variation in wing morphology in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling D. koepferae [J].
Carreira, V. P. ;
Soto, I. M. ;
Hasson, E. ;
Fanara, J. J. .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2006, 19 (04) :1275-1282
[4]   REACTION NORMS OF SIZE CHARACTERS IN RELATION TO GROWTH TEMPERATURE IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER - AN ISOFEMALE LINES ANALYSIS [J].
DAVID, JR ;
MORETEAU, B ;
GAUTHIER, JP ;
PETAVY, G ;
STOCKEL, A ;
IMASHEVA, AG .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 1994, 26 (03) :229-251
[5]   Nested cladistic analysis of Brazilian populations of Drosophila serido [J].
de Brito, RA ;
Manfrin, MH ;
Sene, FM .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 22 (01) :131-143
[6]  
Debat V, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P2773, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01519.x
[7]  
Dryden IL., 2016, STAT SHAPE ANAL
[8]   Genotype by environment interactions in viability and developmental time in populations of cactophilic Drosophila [J].
Fanara, JJ ;
Folguera, G ;
Iriarte, PF ;
Mensch, J ;
Hasson, E .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2006, 19 (03) :900-908
[9]   Developmental time and thorax length differences between the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii and D-koepferae reared in different natural hosts [J].
Fanara, JJ ;
Mensch, J ;
Folguera, G ;
Hasson, E .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) :203-214
[10]   Oviposition preference and life history traits in cactophilic Drosophila koepferae and D-buzzatii in association with their natural hosts [J].
Fanara, JJ ;
Fontdevila, A ;
Hasson, E .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) :173-190