An efficacy and tolerance comparison of emedastine difumarate 0.05% and levocabastine hydrochloride 0.05%: Reducing chemosis and eyelid swelling in subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis

被引:20
作者
Secchi, A [1 ]
Leonardi, A
Discepola, M
Deschenes, J
Abelson, MB
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Ophthalmol, Padua, Italy
[2] McGill Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[3] Royal Victoria Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA USA
[5] Schepens Eye Res Inst, Boston, MA USA
来源
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 2000年 / 78卷
关键词
seasonal allergic conjunctivitis; chemosis; eyelid swelling; emedastine difumarate; levocabastine hydrochloride;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078s230048.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare emedastine ophthalmic solution 0.05% BID to levocabastine ophthalmic suspension 0.05% BID in reducing chemosis, eyelid swelling and other signs and symptoms in subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Methods: In a randomized, double-masked, parallel controlled study, emedastine ophthalmic solution 0.05% BID was compared to levocabastine ophthalmic suspension 0.05% BID for control of chemosis, eyelid swelling and other parameters in the environmental allergy study model. Results: At Days 7, 14, 30 and 42, emedastine was significantly better than levocabastine at controlling chemosis and eyelid swelling (p<0.05), A statistical trend was seen at Day 3 (0.05<p<0.10), Results were clinically relevant at Days 30 and 42, Emedastine was also significantly better at reducing redness and itching at Days 7, 14, 30 and 42 (p<0.05), Conclusion: Emedastine is more efficacious than levocabastine in reducing chemosis, eyelid swelling and other efficacy variables associated with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 51
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   CONJUNCTIVITIS OF ALLERGIC ORIGIN - IMMUNOLOGICAL MECHANISMS AND CURRENT APPROACHES TO THERAPY [J].
ABELSON, MB ;
SCHAEFER, K .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 38 :115-132
[2]   H-1-HISTAMINE AND H-2-HISTAMINE RECEPTOR-MEDIATED VASODILATION VARIES WITH AGING IN HUMANS [J].
BEDARIDA, G ;
BUSHELL, E ;
BLASCHKE, TF ;
HOFFMAN, BB .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 58 (01) :73-80
[3]   HISTAMINE-INDUCED VENODILATION IN HUMAN-BEINGS INVOLVES BOTH H-1 AND H-2-RECEPTOR SUBTYPES [J].
DACHMAN, WD ;
BEDARIDA, G ;
BLASCHKE, TF ;
HOFFMAN, BB .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 93 (03) :606-614
[4]  
ELSHAXLY AE, 1996, IMMUNOPHARM IMMUNOT, V18, P597
[5]   EFFICACY OF LEVOCABASTINE IN CONJUNCTIVAL PROVOCATION STUDIES [J].
JANSSENS, M .
DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1992, 82 (04) :341-351
[6]   INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF EMEDASTINE DIFUMARATE ON HISTAMINE-RELEASE [J].
SAITO, T ;
HAGIHARA, A ;
IGARASHI, N ;
MATSUDA, N ;
YAMASHITA, A ;
ITO, K ;
MIO, M ;
TASAKA, K .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 62 (02) :137-143
[7]  
Yanni JM, 1999, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V117, P643
[8]   PRECLINICAL EFFICACY OF EMEDASTINE, A POTENT, SELECTIVE HISTAMINE H-1 ANTAGONIST FOR TOPICAL OCULAR USE [J].
YANNI, JM ;
STEPHENS, DJ ;
PARNELL, DW ;
SPELLMAN, JM .
JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 10 (04) :665-675