Factors Affecting the Item Parameter Estimation and Classification Accuracy of the DINA Model

被引:70
作者
de la Torre, Jimmy [1 ]
Hong, Yuan [1 ]
Deng, Weiling [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Educ Psychol, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Educ Testing Serv, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
关键词
COGNITIVE DIAGNOSIS; RESPONSE THEORY; RULE-SPACE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00110.x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
To better understand the statistical properties of the deterministic inputs, noisy "and" gate cognitive diagnosis (DINA) model, the impact of several factors on the quality of the item parameter estimates and classification accuracy was investigated. Results of the simulation study indicate that the fully Bayes approach is most accurate when the prior distribution matches the latent class structure. However, when the latent classes are of indefinite structure, the empirical Bayes method in conjunction with an unstructured prior distribution provides much better estimates and classification accuracy. Moreover, using empirical Bayes with an unstructured prior does not lead to extremely poor results as other prior-estimation method combinations do. The simulation results also show that increasing the sample size reduces the variability, and to some extent the bias, of item parameter estimates, whereas lower level of guessing and slip parameter is associated with higher quality item parameter estimation and classification accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 249
页数:23
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OBJECT ORIENTED MATR
[2]   Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis [J].
De la Torre, J ;
Douglas, JA .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2004, 69 (03) :333-353
[3]  
de la Torre J., 2008, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V73, P595, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11336-008-9063-2
[4]  
de la Torre J., 2008, INT M PSYCH SOC DURH
[5]   A Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Options [J].
de la Torre, Jimmy .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2009, 33 (03) :163-183
[6]   DINA Model and Parameter Estimation: A Didactic [J].
de la Torre, Jimmy .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2009, 34 (01) :115-130
[7]  
DELATORRE J, 2008, M NAT COUNC MEAS ED
[8]  
Doignon J.-P., 1999, Knowledge spaces
[9]   A GENERAL LATENT TRAIT MODEL FOR RESPONSE PROCESSES [J].
EMBRETSON, S .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1984, 49 (02) :175-186
[10]   Test construction for cognitive diagnosis [J].
Henson, R ;
Douglas, J .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2005, 29 (04) :262-277