Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study

被引:3
|
作者
Garg, Rahul [1 ]
Bagga, Rashmi [1 ]
Kumari, Aruna [1 ]
Kalra, Jasvinder [1 ]
Jain, Vanita [1 ]
Saha, Subhas Chandra [1 ]
Kumar, Praveen [2 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Neonatol, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Foley’ s catheter; misoprostol; dinoprostone; cervical ripening; induction of labour; LABOR INDUCTION; INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; MECHANICAL METHODS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; COMBINATION; INCREASE; BALLOON;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2021.1904227
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
We compared two combined methods for cervical ripening before induction of labour (IOL) Women (n = 150) were randomised into Foley's-misoprostol (n = 75) and Foley's-dinoprostone (n = 75) groups. A single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet (25 mu g) or intracervical dinoprostone gel (0.5 mg) were used alongwith intracervical Foley's. The primary outcome was induction-delivery interval (IDI) and secondary outcomes were change in Bishop's score, oxytocin requirement, caesarean section (CS) rate, chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcome. The mean parity, gestation and indications for IOL were similar in the two groups. The IDI (19 h 37 min and 19 h 20 min; p = .683), cervical ripening time, oxytocin requirement, CS rate (18.7 and 25.4%, p = .322) and neonatal outcome were similar. Hyperstimulation developed in 2.7% women with Foley's-misoprostol and in 1.3% with Foley's-dinoprostone (p = .55). No woman had chorioamnionitis. Thus, these two combined methods of cervical ripening and IOL were observed to be similarly efficacious. A low incidence of hyperstimulation and no chorioamnionitis may be attributed to using a single dose of prostaglandins. Misoprostol may be substituted for dinoprostone in resource limited countries.Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Combined methods for cervical ripening (intracervical Foley's plus prostaglandins) before induction of labour (IOL) may be similarly or more efficacious than individual methods. Most studies comparing various combined methods have used repeated doses of prostaglandins. A combined method using repetitive doses of prostaglandins may increase the risk of hyperstimulation and also of infection consequent to repeated vaginal examination to administer prostaglandins. These two concerns may be offset by combining a single dose of prostaglandin with intracervical Foley's catheter. What do the results of this study add? Two combined methods for cervical ripening using a single dose of vaginal misoprostol (25 mu g) or intracervical dinoprostone gel (0.5 mg) co-administered with intracervical Foley's catheter were found to be similarly efficacious. The IDI (19 h 37 min and 19 h 20 min; p = .683), cervical ripening time, oxytocin requirement, CS rate (18.7 and 25.4%, p = .322) and neonatal outcome were similar. The incidence of hyperstimulation was low (2.7 and 1.3% with Foley's-misoprostol and Foley's-dinoprostone, respectively) and no woman had chorioamnionitis. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Combined methods for cervical ripening using a single dose of prostaglandins (misoprostol or dinoprostone) were observed to be similarly efficacious. Misoprostol is a cheaper alternative to dinoprostone and may be utilised in resource limited countries. These methods may be compared with each other in more number of women in order to identify which combined method is more efficient and safe.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 238
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening before diagnostic hysteroscopy in nulliparous women
    Inal, H.
    Inal, Z.
    Tonguc, E.
    Var, T.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 446 - 447
  • [32] Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening before diagnostic hysteroscopy in nulliparous women
    Inal, Hasan Ali
    Inal, Zeynep Hafiza Ozturk
    Tonguc, Esra
    Var, Turgut
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (05) : 1326 - 1331
  • [33] Intracervical double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation
    Canadas, Javier Vega
    Gonzalez, Maria Teulon
    Limon, Natalia Pagola
    Alguacil, Maria Sanz
    Prieto, Maria Garcia-Lujan
    Riaza, Rocio Canete
    Montero-Macias, Rosa
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 304 (06) : 1475 - 1484
  • [34] Comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter alone or in combination for termination of second trimester pregnancy
    Rezk, Mohamed Abd-Allah
    Sanad, Zakaria
    Dawood, Ragab
    Emarh, Mohamed
    Masood, Alaa
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (01) : 93 - 96
  • [35] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INTRA VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL TABLET VERSUS INTRA CERVICAL DINOPROSTONE GEL FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND INDUCTION OF LABOUR
    Madhavi, K. N.
    Polaiah, K. P.
    Sivaiah, Thokala
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (11): : 1769 - 1775
  • [36] Intracervical double‐balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation
    Javier Vega Cañadas
    María Teulón González
    Natalia Pagola Limón
    María Sanz Alguacil
    María García-Luján Prieto
    Rocío Canete Riaza
    Rosa Montero-Macías
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 304 : 1475 - 1484
  • [37] Comparative Study of Intra-Cervical Foley Catheter and Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening
    Fareed, Perveena
    Malik, Saba
    Mahajan, Neha
    Nazir, Tanzeela
    Kawoosa, Sanjeeda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2015, 3 (04) : 40 - 43
  • [38] A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming
    Tan, T-C
    Yan, S. Y.
    Chua, T. M.
    Biswas, A.
    Chong, Y-S
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 117 (10) : 1270 - 1277
  • [39] Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial
    de Oliveira e Oliveira, Maria Virginia
    von Oberst, Priscilla
    Correa Leite, Guilherme Karam
    Aguemi, Adalberto
    Kenj, Grecy
    de Toledo Leme, Vera Denise
    Sass, Nelson
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2010, 32 (07): : 346 - 351
  • [40] Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: An individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Patabendige, Malitha
    Chan, Fei
    Vayssiere, Christophe
    Ehlinger, Virginie
    Van Gemund, Nicolette
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    Prager, Martina
    Marions, Lena
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Young, David C.
    Le Roux, Paul A.
    Gregson, Sarah
    Waterstone, Mark
    Rolnik, Daniel L.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Li, Wentao
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 (09) : 1167 - 1180