Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study

被引:3
|
作者
Garg, Rahul [1 ]
Bagga, Rashmi [1 ]
Kumari, Aruna [1 ]
Kalra, Jasvinder [1 ]
Jain, Vanita [1 ]
Saha, Subhas Chandra [1 ]
Kumar, Praveen [2 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Neonatol, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Foley’ s catheter; misoprostol; dinoprostone; cervical ripening; induction of labour; LABOR INDUCTION; INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; MECHANICAL METHODS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; COMBINATION; INCREASE; BALLOON;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2021.1904227
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
We compared two combined methods for cervical ripening before induction of labour (IOL) Women (n = 150) were randomised into Foley's-misoprostol (n = 75) and Foley's-dinoprostone (n = 75) groups. A single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet (25 mu g) or intracervical dinoprostone gel (0.5 mg) were used alongwith intracervical Foley's. The primary outcome was induction-delivery interval (IDI) and secondary outcomes were change in Bishop's score, oxytocin requirement, caesarean section (CS) rate, chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcome. The mean parity, gestation and indications for IOL were similar in the two groups. The IDI (19 h 37 min and 19 h 20 min; p = .683), cervical ripening time, oxytocin requirement, CS rate (18.7 and 25.4%, p = .322) and neonatal outcome were similar. Hyperstimulation developed in 2.7% women with Foley's-misoprostol and in 1.3% with Foley's-dinoprostone (p = .55). No woman had chorioamnionitis. Thus, these two combined methods of cervical ripening and IOL were observed to be similarly efficacious. A low incidence of hyperstimulation and no chorioamnionitis may be attributed to using a single dose of prostaglandins. Misoprostol may be substituted for dinoprostone in resource limited countries.Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Combined methods for cervical ripening (intracervical Foley's plus prostaglandins) before induction of labour (IOL) may be similarly or more efficacious than individual methods. Most studies comparing various combined methods have used repeated doses of prostaglandins. A combined method using repetitive doses of prostaglandins may increase the risk of hyperstimulation and also of infection consequent to repeated vaginal examination to administer prostaglandins. These two concerns may be offset by combining a single dose of prostaglandin with intracervical Foley's catheter. What do the results of this study add? Two combined methods for cervical ripening using a single dose of vaginal misoprostol (25 mu g) or intracervical dinoprostone gel (0.5 mg) co-administered with intracervical Foley's catheter were found to be similarly efficacious. The IDI (19 h 37 min and 19 h 20 min; p = .683), cervical ripening time, oxytocin requirement, CS rate (18.7 and 25.4%, p = .322) and neonatal outcome were similar. The incidence of hyperstimulation was low (2.7 and 1.3% with Foley's-misoprostol and Foley's-dinoprostone, respectively) and no woman had chorioamnionitis. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Combined methods for cervical ripening using a single dose of prostaglandins (misoprostol or dinoprostone) were observed to be similarly efficacious. Misoprostol is a cheaper alternative to dinoprostone and may be utilised in resource limited countries. These methods may be compared with each other in more number of women in order to identify which combined method is more efficient and safe.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 238
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study
    Chowdhary, Anqa
    Bagga, Rashmi
    Kalra, Jasvinder
    Jain, Vanita
    Saha, Subhas Chandra
    Kumar, Praveen
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 39 (04) : 461 - 467
  • [2] Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial
    Abdi, Nazanin
    Alavi, Azin
    Pakbaz, Forough
    Darabi, Hossein
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [3] Cervical ripening: A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone
    Perry, KG
    Larmon, JE
    May, WL
    Robinette, LG
    Martin, RW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (06) : 1333 - 1337
  • [4] Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial
    Aduloju, Olusola P.
    Akintayo, Akinyemi A.
    Adanikin, Abiodun I.
    Ade-Ojo, Idowu P.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 (06) : 578 - 584
  • [5] Efficacy of Foley Catheter Bulb with Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel versus Dinoprostone Gel Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labour: An Observational Study
    Bhowmick, Sohan
    Das, Nilratan
    Das, Tanmoy
    Biswas, Arunava
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 18 (05) : QC1 - QC4
  • [6] Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
    Agarwal, N
    Gupta, A
    Kriplani, A
    Bhatla, N
    Parul
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2003, 29 (03) : 147 - 151
  • [7] Comparative Study of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel for Induction of Labour
    Jadhav, Sneha Shahaji
    Shirsat, Arti Siddharth
    Risbud, Neelesh Sharad
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2020, 9 (34): : 2442 - 2446
  • [8] Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
    Roudsari, Fatemeh Vahid
    Ayati, Sedigheh
    Ghasemi, Marzieh
    Mofrad, Maliheh Hasanzadeh
    Shakeri, Mohamad Taghi
    Farshidi, Farnoush
    Shahabian, Masoud
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 10 (01): : 149 - 154
  • [9] Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial
    Nazanin Abdi
    Azin Alavi
    Forough Pakbaz
    Hossein Darabi
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [10] Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Howard Hao
    Huang, Ben-Shian
    Cheng, Min
    Yeh, Chang-Ching
    Lin, I-Chia
    Horng, Huann-Cheng
    Huang, Hsin-Yi
    Lee, Wen-Ling
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (06)