Thresholds for chickpea leaf expansion and transpiration response to soil water deficit

被引:75
作者
Soltani, A [1 ]
Khooie, FR
Ghassemi-Golezani, K
Moghaddam, M
机构
[1] Gorgan Univ Agr Sci, Dept Agron, Gorgan, Iran
[2] Tabriz Univ, Dept Agron, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
leaf expansion; transpiration; water deficit; chickpea; simulation;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00122-2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study determined the thresholds (the onset of decline) for leaf expansion (C-L) and transpiration (C-T) responses to soil water deficit in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and evaluated their importance to crop performance under rainfed conditions using a chickpea simulation model in two contrasting locations. Two pot experiments were conducted to determine the thresholds during adrying cycle, when plant responses were monitored as the soil dried progressively. Leaf area expansion and transpiration did not change until the fraction of transpirable soil water (FTSW) reached 0.48 (C-L) and 0.34 (C-T), respectively, and then decreased linearly to FTSW of 0.03 for leaf expansion and 0 for transpiration. Simulation results of sensivity test showed that for long and intensive terminal droughts, high C-L and C-T and for short and intermittent droughts, low C-L and C-T favor grain yield but the yield increases with best combinations of C-L and C-T do not exceed 1% (20 kg ha(-1)) and 5% (40 kg ha(-1)), respectively. Thus, the contribution of C-L and C-T differences in crop performance under water deficit conditions seems limited. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 210
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Potential uses and limitations of crop models [J].
Boote, KJ ;
Jones, JW ;
Pickering, NB .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1996, 88 (05) :704-716
[2]   Field pea transpiration and leaf growth in response to soil water deficits [J].
Lecoeur, J ;
Sinclair, TR .
CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (02) :331-335
[3]  
Loomis R.S., 1992, Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems
[4]   Stomatal closure of maize hybrids in response to drying soil [J].
Ray, JD ;
Sinclair, TR .
CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (03) :803-807
[5]   WATER DYNAMICS IN THE SOIL-PLANT-ATMOSPHERE SYSTEM [J].
RITCHIE, JT .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1981, 58 (1-3) :81-96
[6]   COMPARISON OF WATER EXTRACTION MODELS FOR GRAIN-SORGHUM UNDER CONTINUOUS SOIL DRYING [J].
ROBERTSON, MJ ;
FUKAI, S .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1994, 36 (02) :145-160
[7]   Soil-water thresholds for the responses of leaf expansion and gas exchange: A review [J].
Sadras, VO ;
Milroy, SP .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1996, 47 (2-3) :253-266
[8]   PHYSIOLOGICAL-BASIS OF THE RESPONSE OF HARVEST INDEX TO THE FRACTION OF WATER TRANSPIRED AFTER ANTHESIS - A SIMPLE-MODEL TO ESTIMATE HARVEST INDEX FOR DETERMINATE SPECIES [J].
SADRAS, VO ;
CONNOR, DJ .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1991, 26 (3-4) :227-239
[9]  
SAS Institute, 1989, SAS STAT US GUID
[10]   IMPROVING GENOTYPIC ADAPTATION IN CROPS - A ROLE FOR BREEDERS, PHYSIOLOGISTS AND MODELERS [J].
SHORTER, R ;
LAWN, RJ ;
HAMMER, GL .
EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1991, 27 (02) :155-175