The impact of technology on the human decision-making process

被引:15
作者
Darioshi, Roy [1 ,2 ]
Lahav, Eyal [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Guilford Glazer Fac Business & Management, Dept Publ Policy & Management, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Open Univ Israel, Dept Management & Econ, Raanana, Israel
关键词
behavioral economics; decision making; technology; HEALTH INFORMATION; AUTOMATION; EMOTIONS; JUDGMENT; CHOICE; BIAS; WEB;
D O I
10.1002/hbe2.257
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article, in the field of behavioral economics, deals with the impact of technology on the human decision-making process. Many companies worldwide offer technologies (platforms, devices, search engines, etc.) that purport to help a person in the various phases of decision making but still leave the final decision in the hands of the human being. Technologies may help a person make more intelligent and informed decisions, but they may also expose a person to many decision-making biases. We review the leading factors that cause decision-making biases due to the use of technologies and build a theoretical model for analyzing technologies that examines the feasibility of using them for decision making. We also demonstrate the implementation of this model on products of four well-known companies: Google, ProQuest, MobilEye, and Waze. Our model contributes to the literature on the impact of technology on human decision making and provides an important basis for future research on this topic.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 400
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Gentzkow, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) :211-235
[2]   Finance, technology and disruption [J].
An, Jiafu ;
Rau, Raghavendra .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2021, 27 (4-5) :334-345
[3]   The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making [J].
Andrade, Eduardo B. ;
Ariely, Dan .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2009, 109 (01) :1-8
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence
[5]  
Ariely D., 2016, TIME PRESSURE BEHAV
[6]  
Ariely Dan., 2016, Payoff: The hidden logic that shapes our motivations
[7]   The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US Election [J].
Bossetta, Michael .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2018, 95 (02) :471-496
[8]   Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment [J].
Brasel, S. Adam ;
Gips, James .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) :226-233
[9]  
Brigham Tara J., 2017, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, V36, P399, DOI 10.1080/02763869.2017.1369289
[10]   The use of graphs as decision aids in relation to information overload and managerial decision quality [J].
Chan, SY .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2001, 27 (06) :417-425