Heterogeneity, spillovers and eco-efficiency of European industries under different pollutants' scenarios. Is there a definite direction?

被引:18
作者
Stergiou, Eirini [1 ]
Kounetas, Konstantinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Econ, Patras 26504, Greece
关键词
Industries; Eco-efficiency; Metafrontier; Spillovers; Catch-up; Kaya identity; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; CONVERGENCE; CHINA; EMISSIONS; ENERGY; DECOMPOSITION; PERFORMANCE; DISTANCES; DYNAMICS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107377
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Eco-efficiency is the ability to create more goods and services with less impact on the environment while it consists a dominant strategy for the European Union in view of the New Green Deal. In recent years, its assessment, especially for the manufacturing sector, has attracted the interest of policymakers as a strategy in the pursuit of sustainability. However, a clear-cut direction on which industries should follow does not exist. In this applied study, we estimate distinct objectives of economic and ecological performance, introducing diverse scenarios regarding specific environmental pressures, by utilizing directional distance functions under a meta -frontier framework. The methodology is implemented to a sample of 14 industries from the manufacturing sector from 27 European countries over the period 1995-2011. Our results reveal that the existence of a unified pro-duction technology set causes large differences in the eco-efficiency levels of the manufacturing sector while energy intensive industries can be characterized as the most eco-inefficient. Although the speed of industrial eco-efficiency convergence increases throughout the years, the case of CO2 emissions presents an irregular behavior compared to the other greenhouse gases and air pollutants. Thus, a decomposition analysis of the manufacturing CO2 emissions is considered as a further subject of interest in the study.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2018
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2015, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139177245.003
[4]   Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection [J].
Bartelsman, Eric ;
Haltiwanger, John ;
Scarpetta, Stefano .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :305-334
[5]   Assessing eco-efficiency: A metafrontier directional distance function approach using life cycle analysis [J].
Beltran-Esteve, Mercedes ;
Reig-Martinez, Ernest ;
Estruch-Guitart, Vicent .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 63 :116-127
[6]   A metafrontier directional distance function approach to assessing eco-efficiency [J].
Beltran-Esteve, Mercedes ;
Gomez-Limon, Jose A. ;
Picazo-Tadeo, Andres J. ;
Reig-Martinez, Ernest .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2014, 41 (01) :69-83
[7]   Eco-Efficiency and Convergence in OECD Countries [J].
Camarero, Mariam ;
Castillo, Juana ;
Picazo-Tadeo, Andres J. ;
Tamarit, Cecilio .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 55 (01) :87-106
[8]   Testing the convergence hypothesis: A comment [J].
Carree, M ;
Klomp, L .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1997, 79 (04) :683-686
[9]   Integration, productivity and technological spillovers: Evidence for eurozone banking industries [J].
Casu, Barbara ;
Ferrari, Alessandra ;
Girardone, Claudia ;
Wilson, John O. S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 255 (03) :971-983
[10]   Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency [J].
Chambers, RG ;
Chung, Y ;
Fare, R .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, 98 (02) :351-364