Conceptualising the Victim in England and Wales and the United States within a Spectrum of Public and Private Interests

被引:2
|
作者
Manikis, Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Law, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
victims; participation; public-private interests; comparative law; LAW; RIGHTS; WRONGS;
D O I
10.1093/ojls/gqaa032
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The conception of the victim in criminal justice systems has changed across history and legal systems. A framework that considers the private and public along a spectrum and offers nuances between private and public interests illuminates the ways victims have been conceived within mechanisms of participation in various criminal justice systems and the ways they can oscillate and have oscillated within these categories. This article argues that in England and Wales, victims have been conceived as citizens with both private and predominantly public roles and interests, while in the United States, they have been conceptualised as actors that hold predominantly private interests. Nuances within mechanisms of victim participation that challenge the rigidity of the public/private divide within those jurisdictions are accounted for and discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 242
页数:24
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Is 'viability' viable? Abortion, conceptual confusion and the law in England and Wales and the United States
    Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND THE BIOSCIENCES, 2021, 7 (01):
  • [2] Adolescent Physical Activity at Public Schools, Private Schools, and Homeschools, United States, 2014
    Tribby, Calvin P.
    Oh, April
    Perna, Frank
    Berrigan, David
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2020, 17
  • [3] Raising the floor: New directions in public and private enforcement of labor standards in the United States
    Fine, Janice
    Bartley, Tim
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2019, 61 (02) : 252 - 276
  • [4] PUBLIC-PRIVATE INTERACTION IN CHILD WELFARE: LESSONS FOR CRITICAL SOCIAL WORK FROM CHILE AND THE UNITED STATES
    Andrade-Guzman, Carlos
    Rao, Smitha
    TRABAJO SOCIAL GLOBAL-GLOBAL SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 10 (19): : 25 - 47