Treatment outcomes of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma - A large community-based experience

被引:7
作者
McCloskey, SA
Ellerbroek, NA
McCarthy, L
Malcolm, AW
Tao, ML
Wollman, RC
Rose, CM
机构
[1] Valley Radiotherapy Associates Med Grp, Div Clin Res, El Segundo, CA 90245 USA
[2] Valley Radiat Oncol Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tarzana, CA USA
[3] St Johns Hlth Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Santa Monica, CA USA
[4] Providence St Joseph Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Burbank, CA USA
关键词
conformal radiotherapy; prostate carcinoma; dose escalation; community-based practice;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.20690
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The current study documented the implementation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and assessed the tumor control and toxicity of such treatment in a large, multisite community practice. METHODS. The authors retrospectively reviewed their first 222 consecutive patients with clinically localized (NO) prostate carcinoma treated with a 6-field conformal technique from October 1993 through March 2000. Standardized target definitions, dose planning constraints, and gantry angles were utilized to develop the treatment plan. Patients were categorized by low, intermediate, and high risk. Low risk was defined as T1a-T2a disease, a Gleason score < 7, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than or equal to 10.0 ng/mL (n = 47 [21%]). Intermediate risk was defined as T2b disease, a Gleason score > 6, or PSA level > 10.01 ng/mL (n = 60 [27%]). High risk was defined as 2 of the above risk factors or as T3 disease, a Gleason score > 7, or a PSA level > 20 (n = 115 [52%]). Biochemical disease recurrence was defined in accordance with the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition. Urinary and bowel toxicity were graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scoring system. RESULTS. The median follow-up after radiotherapy for surviving patients was 47 months (range, 0-99 months). The 2 and 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates for all patients were 84% and 78%, respectively. Using logistic regression analysis, lower dose (< 75.6 gray [Gy] vs. 75.6 Gy; P = 0.006), higher risk group (P = 0.033), higher stage (P = 0.045), and higher PSA level (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with biochemical disease recurrence. Toxicity was not significantly correlated with a higher radiotherapy dose. CONCLUSIONS. Dose escalation to 75.6 Gy using a 6-field conformal technique was feasible in the authors' community practice and resulted in acceptable toxicity and early biochemical outcomes. (C) 2004 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2693 / 2700
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, V37, P1035
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[3]   High-precision conformal radiotherapy (HPCRT) of prostate cancer -: A new technique for exact positioning of the prostate at the time of treatment [J].
Bergström, P ;
Löfroth, PO ;
Widmark, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (02) :305-311
[4]   Dose escalation with 3D-CRT in prostate cancer: French study of dose escalation with conformal 3D radiotherapy in prostate cancer - Preliminary results [J].
Bey, P ;
Carrie, C ;
Beckendorf, V ;
Ginestet, C ;
Aletti, P ;
Madelis, G ;
Luporsi, E ;
Pommier, P ;
Cowen, D ;
Gonzague-Casabianca, L ;
Simonian-Sauve, M ;
Maingon, P ;
Naudy, S ;
Lagrange, JL ;
Marcie, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02) :513-517
[5]   Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial [J].
Bolla, M ;
Collette, L ;
Blank, L ;
Warde, P ;
Dubois, JB ;
Mirimanoff, RO ;
Storme, G ;
Bernier, J ;
Kuten, A ;
Sternberg, C ;
Mattelaer, J ;
Torecilla, JL ;
Pfeffer, JR ;
Cutajar, CL ;
Zurlo, A ;
Pierart, M .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9327) :103-108
[6]   TOXICITY CRITERIA OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) AND THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC) [J].
COX, JD ;
STETZ, J ;
PAJAK, TF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05) :1341-1346
[7]   Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial [J].
Dearnaley, DP ;
Khoo, VS ;
Norman, AR ;
Meyer, L ;
Nahum, A ;
Tait, D ;
Yarnold, J ;
Horwich, A .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9149) :267-272
[8]   3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for high grade prostate cancer: A multi-institutional review [J].
Fiveash, JB ;
Hanks, G ;
Roach, M ;
Wang, SB ;
Vigneault, E ;
McLaughlin, PW ;
Sandler, HM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 47 (02) :335-342
[9]   Results of 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer [J].
FukunagaJohnson, N ;
Sandler, HM ;
McLaughlin, PW ;
Strawderman, MS ;
Grijalva, KH ;
Kish, KE ;
Lichter, AS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (02) :311-317
[10]   Dose response in prostate cancer with 8-12 years' follow-up [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Epstein, B ;
Horwitz, EM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02) :427-435