Improved safety by crossanalyzing quantitative risk assessment of hydrogen refueling stations

被引:42
作者
Kwon, Daehwan [1 ]
Choi, Suel Ki [1 ]
Yu, Chulhee [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Gas Safety R&D, Korea Gas Safety Corp, 1390 Wonjung Ro,Maengdong myeon, Eumseong 27738, Chungcheongbug, South Korea
关键词
Hydrogen; Hydrogen refueling station; Quantitative risk assessment; Hy-KoRAM; Phast; safeti; Crossanalysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.211
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
With the goal of building 310 hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) in Korea by 2022, restrictions, such as location restrictions and separation distances, are being eased, so developing ways to improve technology and safety. As HRSs contain major facilities such as compressors, storage tanks, dispenser, and priority control panels, and a leakage could result in a large fire or explosion caused by an ignition source. To perform quantitative risk assessment, programs, namely, Hy-KoRAM and Phast/Safeti were used in this study. It could determine the damage range and effect on radiant heat and flame length, as well as personal and societal risks, using these programs. The crossanalysis of the two programs also improves the facility's safety and the reliability of the results.(c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:10788 / 10798
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, KOSHA GUIDE P 102 20
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 60079101 KSC IEC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, International Standard IEC 60079-10-1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, OFFSH REL DAT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Classification Code for Explosive Hazardous Area on Gas Facility
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, SAND20215812
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, SAND20090874
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, KOSHA GUIDE P 107 20
[9]  
Clive N, 2006, Failure frequencies for major failures of high pressure storage vessels at COMAH sites: A comparison of data used by HSE and the Netherlands
[10]  
Dong-Hwan K, 2020, KOREAN HYDROGEN NEW