Strut-and-tie model for predicting shear strength of squat shear walls under earthquake loads

被引:20
作者
Chetchotisak, Panatchai [1 ]
Chomchaipol, Weerapong [1 ]
Teerawong, Jaruek [2 ]
Shaingchin, Somboon [3 ]
机构
[1] Rajamangala Univ Technol Isan, Dept Civil Engn, Khon Kaen Campus, Khon Kaen 40000, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
[3] Univ Phayao, Dept Civil Engn, Phayao 56000, Thailand
关键词
Structural wall; Seismic loading; Reinforced concrete; Shear strength; Prediction; REINFORCED-CONCRETE WALLS; BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; STRUCTURAL WALLS; DEEP BEAMS; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; DUCTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114042
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, a strut-and-tie model (STM) was established to predict the peak shear strength of squat shear walls with and without boundary elements. The model was based on two independent shear-transferring mechanisms: diagonal strut and truss mechanisms. The first mechanism was derived using the Kupfer failure criterion for concrete. This derivation comprises the interactive correlation between the shear strengths of the diagonal concrete strut and steel tension tie and expresses the shear strength model of squat walls without web reinforcement. The truss mechanism provides shear strength from the orthogonal web reinforcement. Through nonlinear optimization, three empirical coefficients describing the complex behavior of squat walls and the contribution of the web reinforcement, were determined using a data set of 614 test results. The ten-fold cross validation approach was applied to assess the predictive performance and generality of the proposed model. The accuracy of the proposed model was compared with those of ACI 318-19 and state-of-the-art models, and the comparison demonstrates that the proposed STM performs better than existing models.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
ACI Committee 318, 2019, Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318M-19) and commentary (318RM-19), P623
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PERFORMANCE BASED AS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Journal of the American Concrete Institute, DOI DOI 10.14359/11201
[4]   Shear-Friction Strength of Low-Rise Walls with 600 MPa Reinforcing Bars [J].
Baek, Jang-Woon ;
Kim, Sung-Hyun ;
Park, Hong-Gun ;
Lee, Byung-Soo .
ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2020, 117 (01) :169-182
[5]   Cyclic Loading Test for Walls of Aspect Ratio 1.0 and 0.5 with Grade 550 MPa (80 ksi) Shear Reinforcing Bars [J].
Baek, Jang-Woon ;
Park, Hong-Gun ;
Lee, Jae-Hoon ;
Bang, Chang-Joon .
ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2017, 114 (04) :969-982
[6]   Novel Empirical Expression to Predict Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Walls Based on Particle Swarm Optimization [J].
Baghi, Hadi ;
Baghi, Hani ;
Siavashi, Sasan .
ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2019, 116 (05) :247-260
[7]  
Benjamin JR, 1957, Journal of the Structural Division Proceeding of the American Society of Civil Engineers, V83, P1
[8]   Measuring the prediction error. A comparison of cross-validation, bootstrap and covariance penalty methods [J].
Borra, Simone ;
Di Ciaccio, Agostino .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2010, 54 (12) :2976-2989
[9]   Truss Model for Shear Strength of Structural Concrete Walls [J].
Chandra, Jimmy ;
Chanthabouala, Khatthanam ;
Teng, Susanto .
ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2018, 115 (02) :323-335
[10]   Cracking strut-and-tie model for shear strength evaluation of reinforced concrete deep beams [J].
Chen, Hui ;
Yi, Wei-Jian ;
Hwang, Hyeon-Jong .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 163 :396-408