Glycemic control, self-care behaviors, and psychosocial factors among insulin treated diabetics: A test of an extended health belief model

被引:38
作者
Aalto, AM
Uutela, A
机构
[1] Natl Res & Dev Ctr Welf & Hlth, Hlth Serv Res Unit, FIN-00531 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Natl Publ Hlth Inst, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
type I diabetes mellitus; glycosylated haemoglobin (GHbA(1c)); self-care; health belief model; diabetes-related control beliefs; social support;
D O I
10.1207/s15327558ijbm0403_1
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The relations of diet adherence (DA) and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) to metabolic control, as measured with glycosylated hemoglobin A(1c) (GHbA(1c)), and correlates of self-care were examined among a type I diabetic sample (n = 423). The Health Belief Model (HEM), supplemented by other factors (locus of control, self-efficacy, health value, and social support), was used as a theoretical model. In multiple regression analyses both DA (p<.01) and SMBG (p<.001) were related to GHbA(1c). Theoretically derived path models for HEM (estimated by LISREL) required modifications. DA showed strong associations with diabetes related social support (p<.001) and net benefits of DA (p<.001). SMBG showed strong associations with self-efficacy in SMBG (p<.001) and net benefits of SMBG (p<.001). The revised models explained 14% and 21% of the variation in DA and SMBG, respectively. The results suggest that although perceived net benefits are important determinants of both SMBG and DA, DA is also related to diabetes support, whereas SMBG is more strongly related to perceived self-efficacy. Thus self-care regimen should be planned individually for diabetic patients.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 214
页数:24
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   DAILY STRESS VARIABILITY, LEARNED RESOURCEFULNESS, REGIMEN ADHERENCE, AND METABOLIC CONTROL IN TYPE-I DIABETES-MELLITUS - EVALUATION OF A PATH MODEL [J].
AIKENS, JE ;
WALLANDER, JL ;
BELL, DSH ;
COLE, JA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 60 (01) :113-118
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Research with the locus of control construct: extensions and limitations
[3]   PATIENT PERSPECTIVE ON FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO NONADHERENCE TO DIABETES REGIMEN [J].
ARY, DV ;
TOOBERT, D ;
WILSON, W ;
GLASGOW, RE .
DIABETES CARE, 1986, 9 (02) :168-172
[4]  
AULTO AM, 1993, SOSIAALILAAKETIETEEL, V30, P348
[5]   DIETARY DISINHIBITION, PERCEIVED STRESS, AND GLUCOSE CONTROL IN YOUNG, TYPE-1 DIABETIC WOMEN [J].
BALFOUR, L ;
WHITE, DR ;
SCHIFFRIN, A ;
DOUGHERTY, G ;
DUFRESNE, J .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 12 (01) :33-38
[6]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[7]   SOCIOBEHAVIORAL DETERMINANTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH HEALTH AND MEDICAL CARE RECOMMENDATIONS [J].
BECKER, MH ;
MAIMAN, LA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1975, 13 (01) :10-24
[8]   THE HEALTH BELIEF MODEL AND ADOLESCENTS WITH INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
BOND, GG ;
AIKEN, LS ;
SOMERVILLE, SC .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 11 (03) :190-198
[9]   THE ROLE OF HEALTH BELIEFS IN THE REGIMEN ADHERENCE AND METABOLIC CONTROL OF ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS WITH DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
BROWNLEEDUFFECK, M ;
PETERSON, L ;
SIMONDS, JF ;
KILO, C ;
GOLDSTEIN, D ;
HOETTE, S .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 55 (02) :139-144
[10]   THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG 6 PSYCHOSOCIAL DOMAINS, AGE, HEALTH-CARE ADHERENCE, AND METABOLIC CONTROL IN ADOLESCENTS WITH IDDM [J].
BURROUGHS, TE ;
PONTIOUS, SL ;
SANTIAGO, JV .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1993, 19 (05) :396-402