Evaluation of the ACE employment programme: helping employers to make tailored adjustments for their autistic employees

被引:1
作者
Lopez, Beatriz [1 ]
Kargas, Niko [2 ]
Udell, Julie [1 ]
Rubin, Tomas [1 ]
Burgess, Linda [3 ]
Dew, Dominic [4 ]
McDonald, Ian [5 ]
O'Brien, Ann [6 ]
Templeton-Mepstead, Karen [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Dept Psychol, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[2] Univ Lincoln, Dept Psychol, Lincoln, England
[3] Hampshire Cty Council, Winchester, Hants, England
[4] Portsmouth City Council, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[5] Southampton City Council, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Isle Of Wight Council, Newport, England
[7] Autism Hampshire, Fareham, England
关键词
Autism; Interventions; Assessment; Autism spectrum disorder; Autism spectrum condition; Behavioural phenotypes;
D O I
10.1108/AIA-11-2019-0038
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the views of autistic people, carers and practitioners regarding the barriers autistic employees face at work (Study 1) and to use these views to inform the design of an employment programme for autistic employees without learning disabilities (Study 2). Design/methodology/approach In Study 1, 16 (20%) carers, 17 (21%) practitioners and 47 (59%) autistic adults who had been or were currently employed, answered a survey regarding barriers at work. Study 2 evaluates the efficacy of a set of profiling assessment tools (PA) developed to help employers make individually-tailored adjustments for their autistic employees by delivering an employment programme consisting of 15, 8-week work placements. Findings In Study 1, only 25% of autistic adults reported having had adjustments in the workplace and all groups reported this as the main barrier - alongside employers' lack of understanding. Two sets of results demonstrate the efficacy of the PA tools in addressing this barrier. First, a comparative cost simulation revealed a cost-saving in terms of on-job support of 6.67 pound per participant per hour worked relative to published data from another programme. Second, 83% of autistic employees reported having had the right adjustments at work. Research limitations/implications This is an exploratory study that did not include a comparison group. Hence, it was not possible to evaluate the efficacy of the PA tools relative to a standard employment programme intervention, nor to assess cost reduction, which currently is only estimated from already available published data. Practical implications Overall the findings from these studies demonstrate that the time invested in the high-quality assessment of the profile of autistic employees results in saving costs over time and better outcomes. Originality/value The originality of the Autism Centre for Employment programme resides in that, unlike other programmes, it shifts the focus from helping autistic employees to helping their employers.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 15
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Allport G., 1958, The nature of prejudice
[2]  
Andrews J., 2008, Higher Education in Europe, V33, P411, DOI DOI 10.1080/03797720802522627
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, FULF REW LIV STRAT A
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, I REHABILITATION ISS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, LIFE COURSE OUTCOMES
[6]   The ''autistic psychopathy'' in childhood [J].
Asperger, H .
ARCHIV FUR PSYCHIATRIE UND NERVENKRANKHEITEN, 1944, 117 (01) :76-136
[7]   A Meta-Analysis of Sensory Modulation Symptoms in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders [J].
Ben-Sasson, Ayelet ;
Hen, Liat ;
Fluss, Ronen ;
Cermak, Sharon A. ;
Engel-Yeger, Batya ;
Gal, Eynat .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2009, 39 (01) :1-11
[8]  
Bolton B., 1986, VOCATIONAL EVALUATIO
[9]  
Burgess Audrey F, 2007, Child Adolesc Ment Health, V12, P80, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2006.00432.x
[10]   Known for My Strengths: Positive Traits of Transition-Age Youth With Intellectual Disability and/or Autism [J].
Carter, Erik W. ;
Boehm, Thomas L. ;
Biggs, Elizabeth E. ;
Annandale, Naomi H. ;
Taylor, Courtney E. ;
Loock, Aimee K. ;
Liu, Rosemary Y. .
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2015, 40 (02) :101-119