Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?

被引:164
|
作者
Panebianco, Valeria [1 ]
Barchetti, Giovanni [2 ]
Simone, Giuseppe [3 ]
Del Monte, Maurizio [1 ]
Ciardi, Antonio [1 ]
Grompone, Marcello Domenico [1 ]
Campa, Riccardo [1 ]
Indino, Elena Lucia [1 ]
Barchetti, Flavio [1 ]
Sciarra, Alessandro [4 ]
Leonardo, Costantino [4 ]
Gallucci, Michele [3 ]
Catalano, Carlo [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Oncol & Pathol, Viale Policlin 155, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[3] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Rome, Italy
[4] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Follow-up; Prostate biopsy; Multidisciplinary team; Digital rectal examination; Prostate-specific antigen density; Cribriform morphology; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; TARGETED BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; MRI; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has excellent sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Nevertheless, the clinical utility of negative mpMRI (nMRI) is less clear. Objective: To assess outcomes of men with nMRI and clinical follow-up after 7 yr of activity at a reference center. Design, setting, and participants: All mpMRI performed from January 2010 to May 2015 were reviewed. We selected all patients with nMRI and divided them in group A (naive patients) and group B (previous negative biopsy). All patients without a diagnosis of PCa had a minimum follow-up of 2 yr and at least two consecutive nMRI. Patients with positive mpMRI were also identified to assess their biopsy outcomes. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess both any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to identify predictors of csPCa diagnosis. Results and limitations: We identified 1545 men with nMRI, and 1255 of them satisfied the inclusion criteria; 659 belonged to group A and 596 to group B. Any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities after 2 yr of follow-up were 94% and 95%, respectively, in group A; in group B, they were 96%. After 48 mo of follow-up, any-grade PCa diagnosis-free survival probability was 84% in group A and 96% in group B (log rank p < 0.001). Diagnosis-free survival probability for csPCa was unchanged after 48 mo of follow-up. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, increasing age (p = 0.005) was an independent predictor of lower csPCa diagnosis probability, while increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (< 0.001) independently predicted higher csPCa diagnosis probability. The prevalence of and positive predictive value for csPCa were 31.6% and 45.5%, respectively. Limitations include limited follow-up and the inability to calculate true csPCa prevalence in the study population. Conclusions: mpMRI is highly reliable to exclude csPCa. Nevertheless, systematic biopsy should be recommended even after nMRI, especially in younger patients with high or raising PSA levels. Patient summary: It is a matter of debate whether patients with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate could obviate the need to perform a systematic biopsy. In this report, we looked at the outcomes of patients with negative mpMRI and midterm clinical followup at a reference center. We found mpMRI to be highly reliable to exclude significant prostate cancer; nonetheless, systematic biopsy must still be recommended after negative mpMRI in patients with high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 54
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The current role of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Moldovan, Paul Cezar
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 6 (02) : 137 - 145
  • [42] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate underestimates tumour volume of small visible lesions
    Sorce, Gabriele
    Stabile, Armando
    Luciano, Roberta
    Motterle, Giovanni
    Scuderi, Simone
    Barletta, Francesco
    Pellegrino, Francesco
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Guccini, Ilaria
    Briganti, Alberto
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 129 (02) : 201 - 207
  • [43] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predicts the presence of prostate cancer in patients with negative prostate biopsy
    Lista, F.
    Castillo, E.
    Gimbernat, H.
    Rodriguez-Barbero, J. M.
    Panizo, J.
    Angulo, J. C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2015, 39 (02): : 85 - 91
  • [44] Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate
    Ullrich, Tim
    Quentin, Michael
    Arsov, Christian
    Schmaltz, Anna Katharina
    Tschischka, Alexander
    Laqua, Nina
    Hiester, Andreas
    Blondin, Dirk
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Albers, Peter
    Antoch, Gerald
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (03): : 691 - 698
  • [45] A prospective study of the prostate health index density and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer
    Chen, Yuanchong
    Xu, Dong
    Ruan, Mingjian
    Li, Haixia
    Lin, Guiting
    Song, Gang
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023, 64 (04) : 363 - 372
  • [46] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 Category Cases at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Maggi, Martina
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Mosca, Augusto
    Salciccia, Stefano
    Gentilucci, Alessandro
    Di Pierro, Giovanni
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Barchetti, Giovanni
    Campa, Riccardo
    Sperduti, Isabella
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (03): : 463 - 478
  • [47] Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer
    Stabile, Armando
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Soligo, Matteo
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Esposito, Antonio
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (04): : 594 - 600
  • [48] Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Chaloupka, M.
    Bischoff, R.
    Pfitzinger, P.
    Lellig, E.
    Ledderose, S.
    Buchner, A.
    Schlenker, B.
    Stief, C.
    Clevert, D-A
    Apfelbeck, M.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2019, 73 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [49] A negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging finding does not guarantee the absence of significant cancer among biopsy-proven prostate cancer patients: a real-life clinical experience
    Kim, Jung Jun
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Lee, Hak Jong
    Choe, Gheeyoung
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 50 (11) : 1989 - 1997
  • [50] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Ingole, Sarang M.
    Mehta, Rajeev U.
    Kazi, Zubair N.
    Bhuyar, Rutuja, V
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (01): : 65 - 77