Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?

被引:164
|
作者
Panebianco, Valeria [1 ]
Barchetti, Giovanni [2 ]
Simone, Giuseppe [3 ]
Del Monte, Maurizio [1 ]
Ciardi, Antonio [1 ]
Grompone, Marcello Domenico [1 ]
Campa, Riccardo [1 ]
Indino, Elena Lucia [1 ]
Barchetti, Flavio [1 ]
Sciarra, Alessandro [4 ]
Leonardo, Costantino [4 ]
Gallucci, Michele [3 ]
Catalano, Carlo [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Oncol & Pathol, Viale Policlin 155, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[3] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Rome, Italy
[4] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Follow-up; Prostate biopsy; Multidisciplinary team; Digital rectal examination; Prostate-specific antigen density; Cribriform morphology; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; TARGETED BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; MRI; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has excellent sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Nevertheless, the clinical utility of negative mpMRI (nMRI) is less clear. Objective: To assess outcomes of men with nMRI and clinical follow-up after 7 yr of activity at a reference center. Design, setting, and participants: All mpMRI performed from January 2010 to May 2015 were reviewed. We selected all patients with nMRI and divided them in group A (naive patients) and group B (previous negative biopsy). All patients without a diagnosis of PCa had a minimum follow-up of 2 yr and at least two consecutive nMRI. Patients with positive mpMRI were also identified to assess their biopsy outcomes. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess both any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to identify predictors of csPCa diagnosis. Results and limitations: We identified 1545 men with nMRI, and 1255 of them satisfied the inclusion criteria; 659 belonged to group A and 596 to group B. Any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities after 2 yr of follow-up were 94% and 95%, respectively, in group A; in group B, they were 96%. After 48 mo of follow-up, any-grade PCa diagnosis-free survival probability was 84% in group A and 96% in group B (log rank p < 0.001). Diagnosis-free survival probability for csPCa was unchanged after 48 mo of follow-up. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, increasing age (p = 0.005) was an independent predictor of lower csPCa diagnosis probability, while increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (< 0.001) independently predicted higher csPCa diagnosis probability. The prevalence of and positive predictive value for csPCa were 31.6% and 45.5%, respectively. Limitations include limited follow-up and the inability to calculate true csPCa prevalence in the study population. Conclusions: mpMRI is highly reliable to exclude csPCa. Nevertheless, systematic biopsy should be recommended even after nMRI, especially in younger patients with high or raising PSA levels. Patient summary: It is a matter of debate whether patients with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate could obviate the need to perform a systematic biopsy. In this report, we looked at the outcomes of patients with negative mpMRI and midterm clinical followup at a reference center. We found mpMRI to be highly reliable to exclude significant prostate cancer; nonetheless, systematic biopsy must still be recommended after negative mpMRI in patients with high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 54
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does the introduction of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging into the active surveillance protocol for localized prostate cancer improve patient re-classification?
    Bryant, Richard J.
    Yang, Bob
    Philippou, Yiannis
    Lam, Karla
    Obiakor, Maureen
    Ayers, Jennifer
    Chiocchia, Virginia
    Gleeson, Fergus
    MacPherson, Ruth
    Verrill, Clare
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Brewster, Simon F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (05) : 794 - 800
  • [22] Clinical Utility of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
    Levy, Micah
    Ratnani, Parita
    Moody, Kate
    Garcia, Mariely
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Parekh, Sneha
    Pandav, Krunal
    Shukla, Bhavya
    Prasad, Sonya
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Haines, Kenneth, III
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Wiklund, Peter
    Tewari, Ash
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 28 : 9 - 16
  • [23] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Haider, M. A.
    Yao, X.
    Loblaw, A.
    Finelli, A.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) : 550 - 567
  • [24] Targeted prostate biopsy: value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detection of localized cancer
    Le, Jesse D.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Marks, Leonard S.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2014, 16 (04) : 522 - 529
  • [25] The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer
    Otti, Vanessa C.
    Miller, Catherine
    Powell, Roy J.
    Thomas, Richard M.
    McGrath, John S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 (01) : 82 - 90
  • [26] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know. Part 3: Targeted Biopsy
    Venderink, Wulphert
    Bomers, Joyce G.
    Overduin, Christiaan G.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    de Lauw, Gijs R.
    Sedelaar, Michiel J.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (04) : 481 - 490
  • [27] The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Barrett, Tristan
    Koo, Brendan
    Doble, Andrew
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent
    Warren, Anne
    Kastner, Christof
    Bratt, Ola
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (05) : 724 - 730
  • [28] Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences
    Maximilian Haack
    Vanessa Miksch
    Zhe Tian
    Gregor Duwe
    Anita Thomas
    Angelika Borkowetz
    Kristina Stroh
    Christian Thomas
    Axel Haferkamp
    Thomas Höfner
    Katharina Boehm
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2947 - 2954
  • [29] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate
    Oliveira Neto, Jaime Araujo
    Parente, Daniella Braz
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (02) : 409 - +
  • [30] Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Rico, Luis
    Contreras, Pablo
    Vitagliano, Gonzalo
    Pita, Hernando Rios
    Ameri, Carlos
    Blas, Leandro
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 46 (05): : 367 - 372