Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?

被引:164
|
作者
Panebianco, Valeria [1 ]
Barchetti, Giovanni [2 ]
Simone, Giuseppe [3 ]
Del Monte, Maurizio [1 ]
Ciardi, Antonio [1 ]
Grompone, Marcello Domenico [1 ]
Campa, Riccardo [1 ]
Indino, Elena Lucia [1 ]
Barchetti, Flavio [1 ]
Sciarra, Alessandro [4 ]
Leonardo, Costantino [4 ]
Gallucci, Michele [3 ]
Catalano, Carlo [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Oncol & Pathol, Viale Policlin 155, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[3] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Rome, Italy
[4] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Follow-up; Prostate biopsy; Multidisciplinary team; Digital rectal examination; Prostate-specific antigen density; Cribriform morphology; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; TARGETED BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; MRI; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has excellent sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Nevertheless, the clinical utility of negative mpMRI (nMRI) is less clear. Objective: To assess outcomes of men with nMRI and clinical follow-up after 7 yr of activity at a reference center. Design, setting, and participants: All mpMRI performed from January 2010 to May 2015 were reviewed. We selected all patients with nMRI and divided them in group A (naive patients) and group B (previous negative biopsy). All patients without a diagnosis of PCa had a minimum follow-up of 2 yr and at least two consecutive nMRI. Patients with positive mpMRI were also identified to assess their biopsy outcomes. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess both any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to identify predictors of csPCa diagnosis. Results and limitations: We identified 1545 men with nMRI, and 1255 of them satisfied the inclusion criteria; 659 belonged to group A and 596 to group B. Any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities after 2 yr of follow-up were 94% and 95%, respectively, in group A; in group B, they were 96%. After 48 mo of follow-up, any-grade PCa diagnosis-free survival probability was 84% in group A and 96% in group B (log rank p < 0.001). Diagnosis-free survival probability for csPCa was unchanged after 48 mo of follow-up. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, increasing age (p = 0.005) was an independent predictor of lower csPCa diagnosis probability, while increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (< 0.001) independently predicted higher csPCa diagnosis probability. The prevalence of and positive predictive value for csPCa were 31.6% and 45.5%, respectively. Limitations include limited follow-up and the inability to calculate true csPCa prevalence in the study population. Conclusions: mpMRI is highly reliable to exclude csPCa. Nevertheless, systematic biopsy should be recommended even after nMRI, especially in younger patients with high or raising PSA levels. Patient summary: It is a matter of debate whether patients with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate could obviate the need to perform a systematic biopsy. In this report, we looked at the outcomes of patients with negative mpMRI and midterm clinical followup at a reference center. We found mpMRI to be highly reliable to exclude significant prostate cancer; nonetheless, systematic biopsy must still be recommended after negative mpMRI in patients with high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 54
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Who Benefits from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Suspicion of Prostate Cancer?
    Morote, Juan
    Celma, Anna
    Roche, Sarai
    de Torres, Ines M.
    Mast, Richard
    Semedey, Maria E.
    Regis, Lucas
    Planas, Jacques
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (06): : 664 - 669
  • [12] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Hung, Siu-Wan
    Lin, Yen-Ting
    Liu, Ming-Cheng
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (06) : 266 - 276
  • [13] Nomogram predicting prostate cancer in patients with negative prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance
    Chen, Ming
    Wang, Ren
    Zhang, Tingting
    Zhang, Xiangmin
    Wan, Yonglin
    Fu, Xiaohong
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (12) : 1473 - 1483
  • [14] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer
    Chaloupka, Michael
    Apfelbeck, Maria
    Pfitzinger, Paulo
    Bischoff, Robert
    Lellig, Ekaterina
    Rath, Lukas
    Schlenker, Boris
    Stief, Christian G.
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    RADIOLOGE, 2020, 60 (Suppl 1): : 63 - 69
  • [15] ROLE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER ASSESSMENT
    Tomaskovic, Igor
    Knezevic, Matej
    Pezelj, Ivan
    Culo, Karolina Bolanca
    Novosel, Luka
    Nikles, Sven
    Tomic, Miroslav
    Justinic, Danijel
    Nincevic, Josip
    Pirsa, Matea
    Ruzic, Boris
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2018, 57 : 35 - 39
  • [16] Emerging role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in identifying clinically relevant localized prostate cancer
    Williams, Cheyenne
    Daneshvar, Michael
    Pinto, Peter
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (03) : 244 - 251
  • [17] Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Johnson, David C.
    Raman, Steven S.
    Mirak, Sohrab A.
    Kwan, Lorna
    Bajgiran, Amirhossein M.
    Hsu, William
    Maehara, Cleo K.
    Ahuja, Preeti
    Faiena, Izak
    Pooli, Aydin
    Salmasi, Amirali
    Sisk, Anthony
    Felker, Ely R.
    Lu, David S. K.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (05) : 712 - 720
  • [18] The Contemporary Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Schulman, Ariel A.
    Sze, Christina
    Tsivian, Efrat
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (07)
  • [19] Improved detection and reduced biopsies: the effect of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based triage prostate cancer pathway in a public teaching hospital
    Donato, Peter
    Morton, Andrew
    Yaxley, John
    Teloken, Patrick E.
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Esler, Rachel
    Dunglison, Nigel
    Gardiner, Robert A.
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (02) : 371 - 379
  • [20] Diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Morlacco, Alessandro
    Soligo, Matteo
    Mancini, Mariangela
    Leone, Nicolo
    Zecchini, Giovanni
    Reitano, Giuseppe
    Bednarova, Iliana
    Lacognata, Carmelo Salvino
    Lauro, Alberto
    Zanovello, Nicola
    Novara, Giacomo
    dal Moro, Fabrizio
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 75 (03) : 277 - 283