Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?

被引:164
|
作者
Panebianco, Valeria [1 ]
Barchetti, Giovanni [2 ]
Simone, Giuseppe [3 ]
Del Monte, Maurizio [1 ]
Ciardi, Antonio [1 ]
Grompone, Marcello Domenico [1 ]
Campa, Riccardo [1 ]
Indino, Elena Lucia [1 ]
Barchetti, Flavio [1 ]
Sciarra, Alessandro [4 ]
Leonardo, Costantino [4 ]
Gallucci, Michele [3 ]
Catalano, Carlo [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Oncol & Pathol, Viale Policlin 155, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[3] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Rome, Italy
[4] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Follow-up; Prostate biopsy; Multidisciplinary team; Digital rectal examination; Prostate-specific antigen density; Cribriform morphology; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; TARGETED BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; MRI; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has excellent sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Nevertheless, the clinical utility of negative mpMRI (nMRI) is less clear. Objective: To assess outcomes of men with nMRI and clinical follow-up after 7 yr of activity at a reference center. Design, setting, and participants: All mpMRI performed from January 2010 to May 2015 were reviewed. We selected all patients with nMRI and divided them in group A (naive patients) and group B (previous negative biopsy). All patients without a diagnosis of PCa had a minimum follow-up of 2 yr and at least two consecutive nMRI. Patients with positive mpMRI were also identified to assess their biopsy outcomes. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess both any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to identify predictors of csPCa diagnosis. Results and limitations: We identified 1545 men with nMRI, and 1255 of them satisfied the inclusion criteria; 659 belonged to group A and 596 to group B. Any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities after 2 yr of follow-up were 94% and 95%, respectively, in group A; in group B, they were 96%. After 48 mo of follow-up, any-grade PCa diagnosis-free survival probability was 84% in group A and 96% in group B (log rank p < 0.001). Diagnosis-free survival probability for csPCa was unchanged after 48 mo of follow-up. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, increasing age (p = 0.005) was an independent predictor of lower csPCa diagnosis probability, while increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (< 0.001) independently predicted higher csPCa diagnosis probability. The prevalence of and positive predictive value for csPCa were 31.6% and 45.5%, respectively. Limitations include limited follow-up and the inability to calculate true csPCa prevalence in the study population. Conclusions: mpMRI is highly reliable to exclude csPCa. Nevertheless, systematic biopsy should be recommended even after nMRI, especially in younger patients with high or raising PSA levels. Patient summary: It is a matter of debate whether patients with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate could obviate the need to perform a systematic biopsy. In this report, we looked at the outcomes of patients with negative mpMRI and midterm clinical followup at a reference center. We found mpMRI to be highly reliable to exclude significant prostate cancer; nonetheless, systematic biopsy must still be recommended after negative mpMRI in patients with high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 54
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance
    Glass, Allison S.
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (05) : 730 - 737
  • [2] Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences
    Haack, Maximilian
    Miksch, Vanessa
    Tian, Zhe
    Duwe, Gregor
    Thomas, Anita
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Stroh, Kristina
    Thomas, Christian
    Haferkamp, Axel
    Hoefner, Thomas
    Boehm, Katharina
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (12) : 2947 - 2954
  • [3] Predictive parameters of prostate carcinoma in negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging patients
    Bostanci, Coskun
    Erdem, Kazim
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 49 (02): : 479 - 488
  • [4] Cost consideration in utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer
    Hutchinson, Ryan
    Lotan, Yair
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 345 - 354
  • [5] What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel
    Moldovan, Paul C.
    Van den Broeck, Thomas
    Sylvester, Richard
    Marconi, Lorenzo
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Bolla, Michel
    Briers, Erik
    Cumberbatch, Marcus G.
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gross, Tobias
    Henry, Ann M.
    Joniau, Steven
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    Matveev, Vsevolod B.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    De Santis, Maria
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Yuan, Cathy Yuhong
    Cornford, Philip
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Lam, Thomas B.
    Rouviere, Olivier
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (02) : 250 - 266
  • [6] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    An, Julie Y.
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Ismail Baris
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (05) : 388 - 396
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer
    Cerantola, Yannick
    Dragomir, Alice
    Tanguay, Simon
    Bladou, Franck
    Aprikian, Armen
    Kassouf, Wassim
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (03) : 119.e1 - 119.e9
  • [8] The Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer
    Thompson, J. E.
    van Leeuwen, P. J.
    Moses, D.
    Shnier, R.
    Brenner, P.
    Delprado, W.
    Pulbrook, M.
    Boehm, M.
    Haynes, A. M.
    Hayen, A.
    Stricker, P. D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (05): : 1428 - 1435
  • [9] Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer
    Turkbey, Baris
    Brown, Anna M.
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (04) : 326 - 336
  • [10] MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION
    Garcia-Cruz, Eduardo
    Ramon-Barcelo, Catalina
    Carrion-Puig, Ramon
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2019, 72 (04): : 374 - 380