Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?

被引:167
作者
Panebianco, Valeria [1 ]
Barchetti, Giovanni [2 ]
Simone, Giuseppe [3 ]
Del Monte, Maurizio [1 ]
Ciardi, Antonio [1 ]
Grompone, Marcello Domenico [1 ]
Campa, Riccardo [1 ]
Indino, Elena Lucia [1 ]
Barchetti, Flavio [1 ]
Sciarra, Alessandro [4 ]
Leonardo, Costantino [4 ]
Gallucci, Michele [3 ]
Catalano, Carlo [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Oncol & Pathol, Viale Policlin 155, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[3] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Rome, Italy
[4] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Follow-up; Prostate biopsy; Multidisciplinary team; Digital rectal examination; Prostate-specific antigen density; Cribriform morphology; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; TARGETED BIOPSY; GUIDELINES; MRI; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has excellent sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Nevertheless, the clinical utility of negative mpMRI (nMRI) is less clear. Objective: To assess outcomes of men with nMRI and clinical follow-up after 7 yr of activity at a reference center. Design, setting, and participants: All mpMRI performed from January 2010 to May 2015 were reviewed. We selected all patients with nMRI and divided them in group A (naive patients) and group B (previous negative biopsy). All patients without a diagnosis of PCa had a minimum follow-up of 2 yr and at least two consecutive nMRI. Patients with positive mpMRI were also identified to assess their biopsy outcomes. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess both any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to identify predictors of csPCa diagnosis. Results and limitations: We identified 1545 men with nMRI, and 1255 of them satisfied the inclusion criteria; 659 belonged to group A and 596 to group B. Any-grade PCa and csPCa diagnosis-free survival probabilities after 2 yr of follow-up were 94% and 95%, respectively, in group A; in group B, they were 96%. After 48 mo of follow-up, any-grade PCa diagnosis-free survival probability was 84% in group A and 96% in group B (log rank p < 0.001). Diagnosis-free survival probability for csPCa was unchanged after 48 mo of follow-up. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, increasing age (p = 0.005) was an independent predictor of lower csPCa diagnosis probability, while increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (< 0.001) independently predicted higher csPCa diagnosis probability. The prevalence of and positive predictive value for csPCa were 31.6% and 45.5%, respectively. Limitations include limited follow-up and the inability to calculate true csPCa prevalence in the study population. Conclusions: mpMRI is highly reliable to exclude csPCa. Nevertheless, systematic biopsy should be recommended even after nMRI, especially in younger patients with high or raising PSA levels. Patient summary: It is a matter of debate whether patients with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate could obviate the need to perform a systematic biopsy. In this report, we looked at the outcomes of patients with negative mpMRI and midterm clinical followup at a reference center. We found mpMRI to be highly reliable to exclude significant prostate cancer; nonetheless, systematic biopsy must still be recommended after negative mpMRI in patients with high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 54
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Patterns of Repeat Prostate Biopsy in Contemporary Clinical Practice [J].
Abraham, Nitya E. ;
Mendhiratta, Neil ;
Taneja, Samir S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04) :1178-1184
[2]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[3]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[4]  
Bossuyt PM, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V351, DOI [10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280, 10.1136/bmj.h5527, 10.1148/radiol.2015151516]
[5]   Is negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging really able to exclude significant prostate cancer? The real-life experience [J].
Branger, Nicolas ;
Maubon, Thomas ;
Traumann, Miriam ;
Thomassin-Piana, Jeanne ;
Brandone, Nicolas ;
Taix, Sebastien ;
Touzlian, Julien ;
Brunelle, Serge ;
Pignot, Geraldine ;
Salem, Naji ;
Gravis, Gwenaelle ;
Walz, Jochen .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (03) :449-455
[6]   Presentation of Benefits and Harms in US Cancer Screening and Prevention Guidelines: Systematic Review [J].
Caverly, Tanner J. ;
Hayward, Rodney A. ;
Reamer, Elyse ;
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. ;
Connochie, Daniel ;
Heisler, Michele ;
Fagerlin, Angela .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (06)
[7]   Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparison of Random and Targeted Biopsies [J].
Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry ;
Peyromaure, Michael ;
Schull, Alexandre ;
Beuvon, Frederic ;
Bouazza, Naim ;
Flam, Thierry ;
Zerbib, Marc ;
Muradyan, Naira ;
Legman, Paul ;
Cornud, Francois .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02) :493-499
[8]   Nonpalpable stage T1c prostate cancer: Prediction of insignificant disease using free/total prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsy findings [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Chan, DW ;
Sokoll, LJ ;
Walsh, PC ;
Cox, JL ;
Rittenhouse, H ;
Wolfert, R ;
Carter, HB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) :2407-2411
[9]  
Filson C, 2017, J UROLOGY, V193, pe742
[10]   Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection [J].
Haffner, Jeremie ;
Lemaitre, Laurent ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Leroy, Xavier ;
Jones, J. Stephen ;
Villers, Arnauld .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) :E171-E178